Time: A Scientific Exploration

  • Thread starter Thread starter elosin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concept Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the concept of time, exploring its nature as a dimension of space and its relationship with gravity and velocity. Participants discuss how time is perceived differently by observers, particularly in contexts involving high speeds, such as near the speed of light, and the implications of gravitational time dilation on GPS technology. The conversation also touches on philosophical questions regarding the existence of time before the Big Bang and the concept of a "Block Universe," as proposed by physicists like Kurt Gödel.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's theory of relativity
  • Familiarity with gravitational time dilation
  • Basic knowledge of the Big Bang theory
  • Concept of the Block Universe in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research gravitational time dilation and its effects on GPS systems
  • Explore the implications of the Block Universe theory in modern physics
  • Study the relationship between time and velocity in special relativity
  • Investigate philosophical interpretations of time and existence before the Big Bang
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, philosophers, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the fundamental nature of time and its implications in the universe.

elosin
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
What is time??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is the thing referred to by the "t" in many physics formulas.
 
elosin said:
What is time??

An evolution parameter.
 
Time is a value we use to chronicle changes in matter.
 
It's the same stuff as space, but different.
 
Time is the rate at which things change. Some perceive it as fast others slow. It is said that if we were capable of traveling at the speed of light time would stop.
 
N468989 said:
Time is the rate at which things change. Some perceive it as fast others slow. It is said that if we were capable of traveling at the speed of light time would stop.

So you think time has a relative velocity. Care to clarify this-- you know, as the ratio of one thing compared to another. What are you comparing?
 
  • #10
time is another dimension of space in which all particles in the universe move in one direction only .but because all particles around us move in time with approximately the same velocity we find it hard to visualize time as a dimension of our universe.
 
  • #11
Phrak said:
So you think time has a relative velocity. Care to clarify this-- you know, as the ratio of one thing compared to another. What are you comparing?

The time as we perceive is relative to the observer. The biological time is constant, which is the rate at which we live. If we where to go outer space and travel at speed near the speed of light we would age less compared to people on earth, thus "travelling into the future". When we came back everyone would of aged much more.

Gravity also influences time, it is well known that due to the gravity force or field that satelites "time" is slower than Earth time. That is why the GPS (Global Positioning System) time has to be adjusted.
 
  • #12
Whao, all of this are new information. thanks they help a lot=D
But one more question, if time is (space ,other dimensions that things travel to one direction.), What is before time? If time is what is mention, anything that happen before that should not even happen. Hence if that did not happen how does time even start?
 
  • #13
elosin said:
Whao, all of this are new information. thanks they help a lot=D
But one more question, if time is (space ,other dimensions that things travel to one direction.), What is before time? If time is what is mention, anything that happen before that should not even happen. Hence if that did not happen how does time even start?

Nobody knows, if anyone states anything it is only a theory. In my opinion we will never know, but we will eventually get closer...

I believe everything has always existed, we are just newcomers to this reality.
 
  • #14
elosin said:
What is before time?
The question is nonsensical. Time defines before and after, so it doesn't make sense to ask what is before time. That is like asking "what is north of lattitude".
 
  • #15
DaleSpam said:
The question is nonsensical. Time defines before and after, so it doesn't make sense to ask what is before time. That is like asking "what is north of lattitude".

I think that what he means is what happened before the big bang which is our time reference (13.7 billion years ago).
 
  • #16
N468989 said:
The time as we perceive is relative to the observer. The biological time is constant, which is the rate at which we live. If we where to go outer space and travel at speed near the speed of light we would age less compared to people on earth, thus "travelling into the future". When we came back everyone would of aged much more.

Gravity also influences time, it is well known that due to the gravity force or field that satelites "time" is slower than Earth time. That is why the GPS (Global Positioning System) time has to be adjusted.

You didn't get my point. Time, as you use the word, is not a rate, nor is there something like a "biological time constant" that measures elasped time.

Anyway, sure: elapsed time differs for different observers.
 
  • #17
Time is separation in space-like points in spacetime. The more separation the space-like points (i.e. the less dense the spacetime), the faster the relative rate of time. (This is seen with gravitational time dilation.) If there is no separation between space-like points--like at a singularity of a black hole--time does not pass.

Thus, before the Big Bang came out of singularity, there was no separation in space-like points, so time was not passing.

Only if there was an event preceding the big bang, in which there was separation (i.e. a contracting cycle, or 'big crunch') time didn't ever pass prior to the instant the big bang came out of singularity.
 
  • #18
N468989 said:
I think that what he means is what happened before the big bang which is our time reference (13.7 billion years ago).
To our current understanding that is like asking "what is north of the north pole."
 
  • #19
DaleSpam said:
To our current understanding that is like asking "what is north of the north pole."

Easy, south pole.

Maybe the question "what was before time?" implied a frame of reference different from the one without time. i.e. looking at a black hole from Earth. (your statement regarding north of north pole implies same thing, otherwise south pole is right)
 
Last edited:
  • #20
nitsuj said:
Easy, south pole.
In what way is the south pole north of the north pole? The south pole is, by definition, not north of anything.
 
  • #21
DaleSpam said:
In what way is the south pole north of the north pole?


When the Earth is upside down. (the perspective of the observer standing on Earth facing the south pole)
 
  • #22
DaleSpam said:
The question is nonsensical. Time defines before and after, so it doesn't make sense to ask what is before time. That is like asking "what is north of lattitude".

What I meant is, if you don't even have a time yet or time has not been created. How can you have a before and after if you do not even have a time line? Time is what we human define but is does it even really exist something call time?
 
  • #23
elosin said:
How can you have a before and after if you do not even have a time line?
Exactly. That is why the question is nonsensical.
 
  • #24
nitsuj said:
When the Earth is upside down. (the perspective of the observer standing on Earth facing the south pole)
Nonsense. The location of the poles has nothing to do with the perspective of any observer. Similarly, at any location on the globe, which direction is north and which is south is unrelated to the perspective of any observer.
 
  • #25
DaleSpam said:
Nonsense. The location of the poles has nothing to do with the perspective of any observer. Similarly, at any location on the globe, which direction is north and which is south is unrelated to the perspective of any observer.

Cardinal directions have to be coordinated with something, that's always implied and is intuitive. Because you didn't explicitly mention what the cardinal directions were coordinated with I specifically assumed it was with the observer. So a north direction from the north pole is heading towards the south pole.

Saying you can't travel in a north direction when at the north pole is nonsensical.

Saying you can't travel a "north pole" direction when at the north pole is true but a singularity that seems much different than one for time.
 
  • #26
You can't travel east or west when at the north pole either. All you can do is stay put or start traveling south.
 
  • #27
nitsuj said:
Cardinal directions have to be coordinated with something

Aren't they coordinated with the Earth's magnetic field?

nitsuj said:
Saying you can't travel in a north direction when at the north pole is nonsensical.

No it isn't. At the North Pole you can only travel in one direction - South
 
  • #28
Joncon said:
No it isn't. At the North Pole you can only travel in one direction - South

I'd guess 360 different directions, one of them being north.
 
  • #29
nitsuj said:
Joncon said:
At the North Pole you can only travel in one direction - South
I'd guess 360 different directions, one of them being north.
There's an infinite number of directions, but every one of them is southwards.

Southwards=towards the South Pole, by definition
Northwards=towards the North Pole, by definition
 
  • #30
Time is what defines you, from your birth to your death. It is also what 'moves' you, and your measurements into a orderly fashion temporarily. It has only one beat locally, as proven if you measure your heartbeats against your wristwatch. If your 'given' life span is ten million heartbeats then it will be so no matter where you are or how fast you go.

It's not a illusion, and it has a arrow.
To prove it a illusion you better become immortal :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 96 ·
4
Replies
96
Views
6K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K