Time Dependent Perturbation Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a time-dependent perturbation problem in quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on the interaction picture and the derivation of Ramsey Fringes. Participants are analyzing the Schrödinger equation and the effects of a perturbation Hamiltonian.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formulation of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation and the implications of the perturbation Hamiltonian. There are attempts to derive expressions for the coefficients in the state vector and questions about the correctness of these derivations. Some participants also explore methods for uncoupling the resulting equations.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the mathematical expressions involved, with some participants providing corrections and clarifications. A first-order approximation has been suggested, and while some participants express confidence in the correctness of the derivations, others indicate that they have not verified the equations or integrations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note corrections to the Hamiltonian's form and discuss the implications of these corrections on the equations derived. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity introduced by the time-dependent function in the equations.

Diracobama2181
Messages
70
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Consider a two-level atom with the state space spanned by the two orthonormal states $$|1>$$ and $$|2>$$, dipole-coupled to an external time dependent driving field E(t). After a unitary transformation to the “rotating frame”, the Hamiltonian reads $$H/\hbar = ∆ |2><2| − f(t)[ |2><1|+|1><2|]$$, where ∆ is the difference between the atomic transition frequency ω0 and the frequency of the nearly monochromatic driving field ω, and f(t) is proportional to the temporal envelope of the driving field: E(t) ∝ f(t) cos(ωt). Suppose that $$f(t) =\frac{ λ }{2 \sqrt{\pi} \tau}(e^{-(\frac{ t + T/2}{\tau})^2}+e^{-(\frac{ t - T/2}{\tau})^2})$$ . This represents two pulses of light of length τ hitting the system at times ∓T/2. Let us assume that the amplitude of the driving field ∝ λ is “very small”, and that the system starts out in the state |1>.
Relevant Equations
$$i\hbar c_1(t)=<1|H'|2>c_2(t)$$
$$i\hbar c_2(t)=-f(t)c_2(t)$$
I am assuming this is the interaction picture, so I start with $$|\psi>=c_1(t)|1>+c_2(t)|2>$$. Plugging this into the Schrödinger equation,
I get the equations $$i\hbar c_1(t)=<1|H'|2>c_2(t)$$ and $$i\hbar c_2(t)=<1|H'|2>c_1(t)$$. I am assuming H' (the perturbation) is $$H'= − f(t)[ |2><2|+|1><1|]$$. From there, I get $$i\hbar c_1(t)=-f(t)c_2(t)$$, and $$i\hbar c_2(t)=-f(t)c_2(t)$$. Am I missing anything so far? I just want to make sure I haven't made any faults before continuing my calculation. I know this is supposed to be a derivation of Ramsey Fringes, it that is any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The time dependent equation should be :

##i\hbar dc_m (t)/dt= \sum_n H'_{mn}c_n(t)## where $$H'_{mn}=<m|H'|n>$$
 
Note: Made a mistake writing the problem. It should be $$H'/\hbar = -f(t)[ |2><1|+|1><2|]$$.
 
Abhishek11235 said:
The time dependent equation should be :

##i\hbar dc_m (t)/dt= \sum_n H'_{mn}c_n(t)## where $$H'_{mn}=<m|H'|n>$$
Using that equation and my correction, I get
$$ idc_1(t)/dt=-f(t)c_2(t)$$ and
$$ idc_2(t)/dt=-f(t)c_1(t)$$
Any idea on how I would uncouple these? Usually, I could take the second derivative of one and substitute, but the f(t) term makes that inapplicable.
 
Diracobama2181 said:
Note: Made a mistake writing the problem. It should be $$H'/\hbar = -f(t)[ |2><1|+|1><2|]$$.
The diagonal term vanish and off diagonal terms survive with exponential factor(c.f Sakurai's Modern QM). You forgot to write :

##~i \hbar \mathbf{\dot c_1}= ...##
 
Diracobama2181 said:
Using that equation and my correction, I get
$$ idc_1(t)/dt=-f(t)c_2(t)$$ and
$$ idc_2(t)/dt=-f(t)c_1(t)$$
Any idea on how I would uncouple these? Usually, I could take the second derivative of one and substitute, but the f(t) term makes that inapplicable.
Try using Dyson Series or any other approximation technique
 
Ok, using a first order approximation, I get
$$c_1(t)=-\frac{i}{\hbar}\int_{-\infty}^{0}<1|(-\hbar f (t))(|2><1|+|1><2|)|2>dt$$
and
$$c_2(t)=-\frac{i}{\hbar}\int_{-\infty}^{0}<2|(-\hbar f(t))(|2><1|+|1><2|)|1>dt$$

or

$$c_1(t)=-\frac{i}{\hbar}\int_{-\infty}^{t}-\hbar f(t)dt$$
and
$$c_2(t)=-\frac{i}{\hbar}\int_{-\infty}^{t}-\hbar f(t)dt$$

Hence,
since $$C_1=1$$ and $$C_2=0$$ to zeroth order,

$$|\psi>=(1+c_1)|1>+c_2|2>$$.

Does this seem correct thus far?
 
Diracobama2181 said:
Ok, using a first order approximation, I get
$$c_1(t)=-\frac{i}{\hbar}\int_{-\infty}^{0}<1|(-\hbar f (t))(|2><1|+|1><2|)|2>dt$$
and
$$c_2(t)=-\frac{i}{\hbar}\int_{-\infty}^{0}<2|(-\hbar f(t))(|2><1|+|1><2|)|1>dt$$

or

$$c_1(t)=-\frac{i}{\hbar}\int_{-\infty}^{t}-\hbar f(t)dt$$
and
$$c_2(t)=-\frac{i}{\hbar}\int_{-\infty}^{t}-\hbar f(t)dt$$

Hence,
since $$C_1=1$$ and $$C_2=0$$ to zeroth order,

$$|\psi>=(1+c_1)|1>+c_2|2>$$.

Does this seem correct thus far?

Seems alright to me
If you have done correctly, then it's all right(I didn't check equation or integration)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K