Time-Dependent Perturbation Theory

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of equations in Time-Dependent Perturbation Theory as outlined in "Quantum Mechanics 2nd Edition" by B.H. Bransden & C.J. Joachain. The key equation discussed is i ℏ ∑k ˙ck(t)ψk(0)e-iEk(0)t/ℏ = λ ∑kH'(t)ck(t)ψk(0)e-iEk(0)t/ℏ. The participant struggled with the transition of subscripts in the scalar product and the treatment of operators, ultimately clarifying that the exponential factors are not operators and should not be manipulated as such. The resolution involved correctly applying the scalar product and recognizing the nature of the Hamiltonian operator.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Time-Dependent Perturbation Theory
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics notation and concepts, particularly eigenfunctions and Hamiltonians
  • Knowledge of the properties of scalar products in quantum mechanics
  • Ability to manipulate complex exponential functions in quantum equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Time-Dependent Perturbation Theory in "Quantum Mechanics 2nd Edition" by B.H. Bransden & C.J. Joachain
  • Learn about the properties of operators in quantum mechanics, specifically how they interact with eigenfunctions
  • Explore the concept of Bohr angular frequency and its applications in quantum mechanics
  • Practice solving problems involving scalar products and perturbation theory equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on perturbation theory, as well as educators seeking to clarify these concepts for teaching purposes.

PatsyTy
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
Note this isn't actually a homework problem, I am working through my textbook making sure I understand the derivation of certain equations and have become stuck on one part of a derivation.

1. Homework Statement


I am working through my text (Quantum Mechanics 2nd Edition by B.H Bransden & C.J Joachain) section 9.1 on Time-dependent Perturbation Theory. Part way through their derivation they give the equation

i \hbar \sum_k \dot{c}_k (t)\psi_k^{(0)}e^{-\frac{iE_k^{(0)}t}{\hbar}}=\lambda \sum_kH'(t)c_k(t)\psi_k^{(0)}e^{-\frac{iE_k^{(0)}t}{\hbar}}

where ##c_k## denotes the time-dependent coefficients, any factor with a ##(0)## superscript denotes a factor relating to the "unperturbed" state, ##\lambda## is just a constant (usually equal to one for physical systems) and ##H'## denotes the "perturbed" Hamiltonian.

From this equation the text states:

"Taking the scalar product with a function ##\psi_b^{(0)}## belonging to the set ##y_k^{(0)}## of unperturbed energy eigenfunctions, and using the fact that ##\langle \psi_b^{(0)} | \psi_a^{(0)} \rangle = \delta_{bk}##, we find that

\dot{c}_b (t) = i \hbar^{-1} \lambda \sum_k H'_{bk}(t)e^{i \omega_{bk} t} c_k(t)

where ##H'_{bk}=\langle \psi_{b}^{(0)} | H' (t) | \psi_k^{(0)} \rangle## and ##\omega_{bk}=\frac{E_b^{(0)}-E_k^{(0)}}{\hbar}## is the Bohr angular frequency.

Homework Equations



Not sure if there are any not given really, it's mostly just rearranging everything

The Attempt at a Solution



So first I multiply both sides by ##e^{\frac{iE_k^{(0)}t}{\hbar}}## cancel it out on the L.H.S and bring all the big terms to the R.H.S giving

i \hbar \sum_k \dot{c}_k (t)\psi_k^{(0)}=\lambda \sum_k c_k(t)\psi_k^{(0)}e^{\frac{iE_k^{(0)}t}{\hbar}}H'(t)e^{-\frac{iE_k^{(0)}t}{\hbar}}

I then change all the ##\psi_k^{(0)}## eigenfunctions to their ket representation

i \hbar \sum_k \dot{c}_k (t)| \psi_k^{(0)} \rangle=\lambda \sum_k c_k(t)e^{\frac{iE_k^{(0)}t}{\hbar}}H'(t)e^{-\frac{iE_k^{(0)}t}{\hbar}} | \psi_k^{(0)}\rangle

I then multiply (i.e take the inner product) of the L.H.S and the R.H.S with ##\langle\psi_b^{(0)}|## giving

i \hbar \sum_k \dot{c}_k (t) \langle\psi_b^{(0)}| \psi_k^{(0)} \rangle=\lambda \sum_k c_k(t)\langle\psi_b^{(0)}|e^{\frac{iE_k^{(0)}t}{\hbar}}H'(t)e^{-\frac{iE_k^{(0)}t}{\hbar}} | \psi_k^{(0)}\rangle

The portion of this equation that is giving me issues is how the ##k## subscript in ##\langle \psi_b^{(0)} | e^{\frac{iE_k^{(0)}t}{\hbar}}## changes to ##b## giving me ##\langle\psi_b^{(0)}|e^{\frac{iE_k^{(0)}t}{\hbar}}##. If I can get this I believe all the exponential terms are not operators so I can pull them out of the braket term to give me ##H'_{bk}=\langle \psi_{b}^{(0)} | H' (t) | \psi_k^{(0)} \rangle## and and then I can just combine the exponentials to give me the Bohr angular frequency term.

I'm sure I am doing something small (or something big) wrong somewhere but I just can't figure it out. Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PatsyTy said:
So first I multiply both sides by ##e^{\frac{iE_k^{(0)}t}{\hbar}}## cancel it out on the L.H.S and bring all the big terms to the R.H.S giving

i \hbar \sum_k \dot{c}_k (t)\psi_k^{(0)}=\lambda \sum_k c_k(t)\psi_k^{(0)}e^{\frac{iE_k^{(0)}t}{\hbar}}H'(t)e^{-\frac{iE_k^{(0)}t}{\hbar}}
This is certainly one of the big wrong things - the exponential factor is part of the sum and is not a global factor, so you can't just multiply both sides by it.
 
  • Like
Likes PatsyTy
Fightfish said:
This is certainly one of the big wrong things - the exponential factor is part of the sum and is not a global factor, so you can't just multiply both sides by it.

Thanks, I see that now. Guess I'll be taking a look at it tomorrow and see if I can think of another way.
 
Start with what the text says and take the scalar product. Also, remember that ##H'(t)## is an operator, so you can't move ##\psi_k^{(0)}## past it like you did on the RHS.
 
  • Like
Likes PatsyTy
vela said:
Start with what the text says and take the scalar product. Also, remember that ##H'(t)## is an operator, so you can't move ##\psi_k^{(0)}## past it like you did on the RHS.

Thanks for the reply! I managed to figure it out. I was getting confused thinking ##e^{-iE_k^{(0)}t/\hbar}## was also an operator. When I get home I'll write out what I did to make sure it's correct.

Thanks again!
 
So I believe the solution is to just change the eigenfunctions to their ket representation and multiply through by ##\langle \psi_b^{(0)} |##

i \hbar \sum_k \dot{c}_k (t)\langle \psi_b^{(0)} | \psi_k^{(0)} \rangle e^{-\frac{iE_k^{(0)}t}{\hbar}}=\lambda \sum_kc_k(t)\langle \psi_b^{(0)} | H'(t)| \psi_k^{(0)} \rangle e^{-\frac{iE_k^{(0)}t}{\hbar}}

Which reduces to

i \hbar \dot{c}_k (t) e^{-\frac{iE_b^{(0)}t}{\hbar}}=\lambda \sum_kc_k(t)H'_{ba} e^{-\frac{iE_k^{(0)}t}{\hbar}}

then move the exponential over to the R.H.S and combine the terms for the Bohrn angular frequency to give what we want

\dot{c}_k (t) =(i\hbar)^{-1}\lambda \sum_kH'_{bk} e^{-i\omega_{ba}t}c_k(t)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K