Time dilation and the pioneer spacecraft

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between time dilation and the Pioneer spacecraft, which were launched in 1973 and are now outside the solar system. Participants explore the concept that time may appear to move faster in regions with less matter, potentially explaining the observed acceleration of the spacecraft. Despite the theoretical implications of General Relativity, the Pioneer anomaly remains unexplained, even after re-analysis of the data. Additionally, the gravitational effects of distant meteorite fields are acknowledged as a complicating factor in understanding the spacecraft's behavior.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity and its implications on time dilation
  • Familiarity with the Pioneer spacecraft missions and their historical context
  • Knowledge of gravitational effects in varying matter distributions
  • Basic principles of astrophysics related to motion and observation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Pioneer anomaly and its implications in astrophysics
  • Study General Relativity's effects on time dilation in varying gravitational fields
  • Examine the distribution and mass of meteorite fields in the outer solar system
  • Explore advanced concepts in astrophysics related to the speed of light and relativistic effects
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and students of astrophysics interested in the implications of time dilation, gravitational effects, and the mysteries surrounding the Pioneer spacecraft's trajectory.

Freyman
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I've been thinking about this for a while but never got around to asking this. This has two parts.

First, I understand that time and matter are closely related and that time slows down when in proximity to more matter. So, time on the moon is faster than time on Earth and time on Jupiter is slower than time on earth.

Second, I'm under the impression that the pioneer spacecraft s, the ones that were launched in 1973 and left the solar system are both accelerating in an unforeseen manner. Could this observed speed increase possibly be due to the lack of relative proximity to matter and time is becoming faster around the pioneer spacecraft s..hence the speed increase?

Let me explain. Let's say it takes 5 seconds to cross from point a to point b at a speed of 1 kph. While it still takes the same 5 seconds to cross from point a to point b at a speed of 1 kph, say time is now faster due to lack of matter in proximity wherein 5 seconds from point a to point b is observed from Earth as 3 seconds. While it still took 5 seconds to go from point a to point b, I observed from Earth that only took 3 seconds b\c of the way time works, so it appeared faster.

Basically, I assume this due to the causal association that time slows when in proximity to matter and the opposite in conditions of less matter..so the obvious lack of matter outside to solar system compared to within it should cause time to go faster, hence observable speed should increase from Earth of any moving objects.

This brings a lot of other interesting possibilities too..like if something moving at just under the speed of light in conditions where time is faster could be observed from Earth as moving faster than light even though the object itself is only moving at just under the speed of light because of the way time works. Also, matter between galaxies would appear from Earth as moving very very fast b\c of a relative lack of matter compared to within galaxies.

Or..am i completely offbase with all this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
To a certain extent you are right. To an distant observer high above a planet with a strong gravitational pull an object moving upwards from the surface, with constant velocity relative to a series of stationary local markers would appear to be speeding up. The converse is true and to the observer on the surface the object would appear to be slowing down. The effect is a slight additional acceleration towards the centre according to an observer near the centre. The problem is that the pioneer data has been re-analysed taking General Relativity into account which should include the effect you describe and yet the anomally still remains. Not having access to the raw data we have to assume they did the analysis correctly.

Another issue is that far out in the solar system are large meteorite fields that largely have a disk distribution. The gravity at the edge of a disk is a function of GM/R rather than the usual GM/R^2 and drops off less rapidly than a purely spheriacal distribution of matter. One has to assume that hese effects have also been taken into account but it is worth noting that no one is exactly sure of the total mass, extent and distibution of the meteor fields at the furthest reaches of the solar system.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
986
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K