Time Dilation Explained: Muon Decay & Reaching Earth

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the phenomenon of time dilation as it relates to muon decay, specifically addressing the half-life of muons, which is 2.2 microseconds. At light speed, only about 70 out of a billion muons reach Earth due to exponential decay, while time dilation suggests that the entire billion could arrive. Experimental tests conducted at various altitudes challenge the assumption of a 2.2 microsecond half-life in our frame, indicating discrepancies in decay rates. The conversation emphasizes the need for precise predictions and experimental validation regarding muon production rates in the upper atmosphere.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity and time dilation
  • Knowledge of muon physics and decay rates
  • Familiarity with experimental methods in particle physics
  • Ability to interpret data from high-altitude muon detection experiments
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the experimental basis for special relativity and its implications on muon decay
  • Study the methods used in high-altitude muon detection experiments
  • Examine the relationship between muon production rates and altitude
  • Explore formal references and FAQs related to muon decay and time dilation
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of particle physics, and anyone interested in the practical applications of time dilation and muon decay in experimental settings.

Quandry
Messages
78
Reaction score
12
As I understand it muons have a half life of 2.2 microseconds, thus, at the speed of light cannot get to the earth. But based on exponential decay, of every billion muons which head or way, about 70 will actually get here. Using time dilation the full billion will get here.
Do we need a billion to say we have muons, or is 70 enough?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct that the simple arrival of muons at the Earth's surface doesn't tell you anything. However, if you assume that their half life is 2.2μs in our frame then you are making predictions about the numbers you would expect to see at different altitudes (and their production rate in the upper atmosphere, which would need a very good explanation), which can be tested. We have done tests at different altitudes (see the experimental basis for SR sticky thread at the top of this forum) and the decay rates don't support a 2.2μs half life when measured in our frame.
 
Ibix said:
You are correct that the simple arrival of muons at the Earth's surface doesn't tell you anything. However, if you assume that their half life is 2.2μs in our frame then you are making predictions about the numbers you would expect to see at different altitudes (and their production rate in the upper atmosphere, which would need a very good explanation), which can be tested. We have done tests at different altitudes (see the experimental basis for SR sticky thread at the top of this forum) and the decay rates don't support a 2.2μs half life when measured in our frame.
Many thanks. Your reference to test at altitude would be of great interest. I have found predictions based on time dilation but so far have not found actual tests. If you had a more specific reference for me that would be appreciated.
 
The experimental evidence thread is a single post with a link to an FAQ which is a list of formal references with some discussion.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K