Muon Time Dilation in Accelerating Frames

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the time dilation formula, gamma = sqrt(1 - v^2 / c^2), in the context of muons circulating in the 14 m diameter AGS facility at Brookhaven at 99.94% of the speed of light. While the formula is derived for inertial frames, the muons are in an accelerating frame. The elapsed time for a particle can still be expressed using the formula, as long as the velocity squared is treated as independent of time. Observers in non-inertial frames perceive time differently, confirming that the formula's application is valid under specific conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity concepts, particularly time dilation
  • Familiarity with the formula gamma = sqrt(1 - v^2 / c^2)
  • Knowledge of inertial vs. non-inertial reference frames
  • Basic calculus for interpreting integrals in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of time dilation in non-inertial frames
  • Explore advanced topics in special relativity, including the effects of acceleration on time perception
  • Learn about the behavior of particles in circular motion at relativistic speeds
  • Investigate the experimental evidence for time dilation using muons in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of relativity, and anyone interested in the implications of time dilation in high-speed particle physics.

bksree
Messages
75
Reaction score
3
Hi
In the book, "Why does E= mc2" by Cox and Forshaw, while discussing time dilation, the example of a muon is given. The authors explain that muons when circulated in the 14 m diameter AGS facility at Brookhaven at 99.94% of the speed of light, its lifetime is increased from the value of 2.2 microseconds (when it is at rest) to 60 microseconds i.e 29 times longer which he explains is equal to gamma = sqrt(1 - v^2 / C^2).

My question is : The formula, gamma = sqrt(1 - v^2 / C^2), is for an inertial system while the muons while moving in the circular orbit are in an accelerating frame. So is it correct to use this expression for time dilation ?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. The correct general formula is that the elapsed time for a particle is$$\begin{eqnarray*}
\Delta \tau&=&\int_{t=0}^{\Delta t}d\tau\\
&=&\frac{1}{c}\int_{t=0}^{\Delta t}\sqrt{c^2dt^2-dx^2-dy^2-dz^2}\\
&=&\frac 1{c}\int_0^{\Delta t}\sqrt{c^2-\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial t}\right)^2-\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial t}\right)^2-\left(\frac{\partial z}{\partial t}\right)^2}dt
\end{eqnarray*}$$But the sum of the squares of the partial derivatives is just the velocity squared, and hence$$\begin{eqnarray*}
\Delta \tau&=&\frac 1c\int_0^{\Delta t}\sqrt{c^2-v^2}dt\\
&=&\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}\Delta t
\end{eqnarray*}$$Note that I've said nothing about the path beyond assuming that ##v^2## is independent of ##t## in the last step, but have assumed that the ##t,x,y,z## coordinates are inertial coordinates.

Note that this case is not reciprocal. An observer circling with the muon would not conclude that lab clocks were ticking slow, but that they were ticking fast - the muon observer's frame is not inertial. So, while some results for inertial motion do hold for non-inertial motion, not all of them do.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, Dale and etotheipi
bksree said:
n is : The formula, gamma = sqrt(1 - v^2 / C^2), is for an inertial system while the muons while moving in the circular orbit are in an accelerating frame. So is it correct to use this expression for time dilation ?
The reference frame in which v is measured is an inertial reference frame.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K