Time for pulse to travel a length

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a train consisting of 23 cars with a specified length and slack between them. The train's engine moves at a constant speed, and the question focuses on determining the time required for a pulse to travel the length of the train.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the train's total distance, with some using the formula t = d/v to find the time for the pulse to travel. Questions arise regarding the relevance of the length of the train cars versus the slack between them.

Discussion Status

Several participants arrive at a time of 4 seconds for the pulse to travel the length of the train. There is ongoing exploration of whether the length of the train cars affects this time, with some suggesting that only the slack matters due to the rigid nature of the cars.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion over the implications of the train car lengths in the context of pulse transmission, indicating a need for clarification on the assumptions made regarding the rigidity of the cars and the mechanics of pulse propagation.

anglum
Messages
275
Reaction score
0
Train problem

Homework Statement


005 (part 1 of 1) 10 points
A 23-car train standing on the siding is started
in motion by the train's engine. There are
4 cm of slack between cars. The cars are 9 m
long. The engine is tightly connected to the
first car and moves at a constant speed of
22 cm/s.
How much time is required for the pulse to
travel the length of the train? Answer in units
of s.


Homework Equations



i used the t = d/v

The Attempt at a Solution



i calculated the distance of the train to be 9m * 23 cars + 4cm slack* 22 cars slack is between = Distance and then converted to cm

and used the Velocity as 22 cm/s

and solved for T

is this the correct approach
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
are my calculations for the distance of the train correct?

and is it correct to use the formula t=d/v to solve for the time the pulse travels
 
i get my calculations for the length of the train to be 20,788 cm

so to solve for the time i took 20,788 cm / 22cm/s

is this correct?
 
I don't think the length of the train cars matters. I believe only the slack matters. What answer do you get if you make that assumption?
 
i get 4 seconds... but why would the length of the train cars not matter? seems strange to me
 
4 seconds was the correct answer ... i just am confused y the length of the cars doesn't matter
 
anglum said:
i get 4 seconds... but why would the length of the train cars not matter? seems strange to me

I don't think the length of the cars matters, because they are rigid bodies. All you have to do is move the first car forward 4cm to transfer the impulse to car 2, then another 4cm to transfer the impulse to car 3, and so on. I could be wrong, but I get the 4 seconds answer as well.
 
anglum said:
i get 4 seconds... but why would the length of the train cars not matter? seems strange to me

As berkeman says, the railcars are rigid objects. This means that the leading and trailing ends of each car move *together*. So as soon as the slack in the coupling at the leading end of a car is used up, this will mean that the trailing end of that car is (almost) instantly beginning to take out the slack in the next coupling at that end. In an idealized situation, there is *no* delay in the pulse passing from one coupling to the next, so the lengths of the cars is irrelevant.

Realistically, "rigid" objects don't move all in one piece. The sudden application of force to one end of the object is communicated by a "shock" traveling at the speed of sound in the material through the body of the object (the molecular bonds are disturbed at one end of the object first, which then disturbs the bonds of molecules further along the object, and so on...). This speed would be somewhere upward of 1000 m/sec, so it takes several milliseconds for the trailing end of a railcar to respond to the fact that the leading edge was yanked forward. In the real world, the length of the cars *would* matter, but the added total delay to the travel time of the pulse would be proportionally small.

I also agree with your result of 4 seconds (I was amused that they chose the values so that the 22's would cancel). The total delay from the "shock" traveling through the bodies of the railcars adds perhaps about another 0.1 second.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K