Time Series: stationary AR(1) -> MA(infinity)

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 22K views
kingwinner
Messages
1,266
Reaction score
0
Theorem:
A stationary AR(1) model can be expressed in terms of MA(infinity).

Proof:
stat5.JPG


Now I don't understand how they get from the second last line to the last line. Where did the term Yt-m go?

I understand you can keep doing the substitution iteratively, but you always have to end up with a "Y" term no matter how many times you do it, but on the last line of the proof there is no "Y" term, so it magically disappared? I'm really confused.

Hopefully someone can explain this (in simple terms if possible). Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They're taking the limit as [itex]\phi[/itex] goes to infinity. What happens to [itex]\phi^m[/itex] in that limit?
 
I think it's the limit as m->∞.

As m->∞,
φm ->0
BUT you also have to look at what happens to the other term, right? What if Yt-m->∞? Then we have indeterminate form 0*∞, and we just can't conclude that the product->0.
(Also, another complication is that Yt-m is a random variable, so I'm not sure if all of these make sense or not.)
 
kingwinner said:
I think it's the limit as m->∞.
You're right -- sorry.

As m->∞,
φm ->0
BUT you also have to look at what happens to the other term, right? What if Yt-m->∞? Then we have indeterminate form 0*∞, and we just can't conclude that the product->0.

(Also, another complication is that Yt-m is a random variable, so I'm not sure if all of these make sense or not.)
I'll take those two complications in reverse order. First, the equation will in general be true "almost surely", meaning with probability 1. It may be possible for [itex]\phi^m y_{t-m}[/itex] to approach a constant or diverge, but this happens with probability 0. Second, you have to know SOMETHING about the y's. If this is the same book that your random walk problem came from, maybe they left out essential information. But the key fact is there in the word "stationary". It takes a little work to prove it, but If y is a decently-behaved RV (i.e., has a CDF) and is stationary and [itex]|\phi|<1[/itex], then [itex]\lim_{m\to\infty}\phi^m y_{t-m}=0[/itex] almost surely.