Time taken to travel x meters with constant acceleration

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the time taken for a rocket to reach a height of 1379.8 meters under constant acceleration of 20 m/s². The initial velocity is confirmed to be 0 m/s, allowing the use of kinematic equations to solve the problem. The correct formula applied is d = vi * t + 0.5 * a * t², leading to the conclusion that the time taken to reach the specified height is approximately 11.746 seconds. A common error noted was the introduction of a negative sign during calculations, which was clarified by participants.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematics and its equations
  • Familiarity with basic algebra and solving quadratic equations
  • Knowledge of acceleration and its implications in motion
  • Ability to interpret physical problems involving motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the four kinematic equations in detail
  • Practice solving problems involving constant acceleration
  • Learn how to derive and manipulate quadratic equations
  • Explore real-world applications of kinematics in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching motion concepts, and anyone interested in applying kinematic equations to solve real-world problems involving acceleration and displacement.

the_cloud
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm trying to solve something that I'm very sure is simple, I just can't seem to find the right equation.

A rocket is traveling straight up, with an acceleration of 20m/s^2. I need to know how long it takes to reach a height of 1379.8m (this is the second part of a question).

I am confused about the acceleration. Does the fact that it's traveling at 20m/s mean that after 2 seconds it's traveling at 400 m/s and at 3 seconds it's traveling at 800 m/s?

And to work out the time it takes to travel that far the equation would be t = 1379.8 / ?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not "travelling at 20 m/s". The acceleration of 20 m/s^2 means that's the velocity increases by an additional 20 m/s every second. But you need another "given" number to solve this problem, so was it also given that it began at rest, so that the initial velocity can be set to zero? If that's number is also given, you have enough information. Then you need the topic called "kinematics", which provides four formulas. One of those formulas mentions these variables: displacement, initial velocity, acceleration and time.
 
a=\frac{dv}{dt}
dv={a}*{dt}
v=at+v_0
v=\frac{dx}{dt}
dx={v}*{dt}
x=x_0+{v_o}{t}+\frac{1}{2}{a}{t}^2
 
Yep, the starting velocity was 0. I'll look into kinematics and see if I can make sense of those formulas.
 
OK, so I've had a go. Can someone please check my answer and see if it's correct? (Sorry for the crappy formatting, I'm not sure how to do sub\superscripts)

initial velocity = 0;
acceleration = 20m/s^2;
displacement = 1379.8;

d = vi * t + 0.5 * a * t^2
1379.8 = 0m/s * t + 0.5 * 20m/s^2 * t^2
1379.8 = (0m) * t + 10m/s^2 * t^2
1379.8 / -10 = t^2
SQRT(-137.98) = t //?
t = 11.746 seconds

I'm not really sure how I ended up with a negative in my square root, but using the positive I get a number that seems reasonable.
 
Your answer is fine.
the_cloud said:
I'm not really sure how I ended up with a negative in my square root,
When you divided both sides by 10, for some reason you added a negative sign. (Perhaps you were mixing that up with subtracting 10 from both sides?)
 
Ah, yep I did. Thanks for everyones help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
935
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K