Constant acceleration in a rocket

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
Frostman
Messages
114
Reaction score
17
Homework Statement
A rocket, starting from the earth, moves away from it subjected to ##a## constant acceleration in the reference system of instantaneous rest of the rocket itself.
a) Obtain the law of motion, that is the dependence of the distance of the rocket from the earth, as a function of the earth's time ##t##.
b) Show that there is a maximum time ##T## after departure, after which it is impossible to send messages capable of reaching the rocket from the ground. Calculate the dependence of ##T## on ##a##
Relevant Equations
Tensor formalism
I thought I'd start by writing the problem in a tensor formalism. I have identified with ##S## the Earth and ##S'## the rocket. Since the acceleration provided is in the rocket's frame of reference, I can write the following four-vector.
$$
a'^\mu=(0, a, 0, 0)
$$
Since we are interested in the equation of motion in the frame of the earth, I go directly to the frame of reference ##S##. Applying the Lorentz transformations.
$$a^0 = \gamma(a'^0+va'^1)=\gamma v a$$$$a^1 = \gamma(a'^1+va'^0)=\gamma a$$
But I get the four-vector acceleration starting from the derivative of the four-vector velocity with respect to proper time.
$$a^\mu = \frac{d}{d\tau}(\gamma, \gamma v_x, \gamma v_y, \gamma v_z)=(\gamma \frac{d(\gamma)}{dt},\gamma \frac{d(\gamma v_x)}{dt},\gamma \frac{d(\gamma v_y)}{dt},\gamma \frac{d(\gamma v_z)}{dt})$$
In particular
$$a^0 =\gamma v a=\gamma \frac{d(\gamma)}{dt}$$$$a^1=\gamma a = \gamma \frac{d(\gamma v_x)}{dt}$$
Considering the second result:
$$\int_0^v d(\gamma v) = a\int_0^t dt$$
So we have:
$$ \frac{v}{\sqrt{1-v^2}}=at$$$$v(t)=\frac{at}{\sqrt{1+a^2t^2}}$$
By integrating speed over time we have:
$$x(t)=\frac 1a \bigg(\sqrt{1+a^2t^2}-1\bigg)$$
Can it be exhaustive?
The interesting thing is that for big times (##t\rightarrow +\infty##), the speed tends to ##1##. So it comes back to me as a result.
For the second point how could I operate? From this time ##T##, since no luminous message sent from Earth will never be able to reach the rocket, it means that the rocket is also traveling at speed ##1##. I would conclude that this time ##T## is for ##T\rightarrow +\infty##. But it seems trivial and stupid (because I have no dependence from ##a##), in what terms should I reason?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Frostman said:
For the second point how could I operate? From this time ##T##, since no luminous message sent from Earth will never be able to reach the rocket, it means that the rocket is also traveling at speed ##1##.
It doesn't imply that the rocket is ever traveling at the speed of light.
 
PeroK said:
It doesn't imply that the rocket is ever traveling at the speed of light.
Okay, taking a step back, there is a time, after that time the messages sent from the Earth will never reach the rocket.
Can I see it in terms of equations of motion? Since the position occupied by the rocket will be after that time T, always greater than the position occupied by the signal.
 
Okay, it's an hyperbola.
Furthermore, the more the acceleration value is greater, the more the trend is that of: ##x(t)=|t|## and this one is the trend of the light signal.
The two trends, as I have drawn them, never meet.