JesseM
Science Advisor
- 8,519
- 17
What's wrong with analyzing time travel in general relativity, which is one of those "known laws of physics"?MM PROES said:I accept the constraints of this forum to theoretical ideas and sticking to ‘known laws of physics’...however ...’fictitious laws of physics ’ can also be a valid reference point...as most ideas and concepts are almost always fictitious initially
Why? What specifically about the GR solutions involving closed timelike curves makes them any more philosophically or logically problematic than other GR solutions?MM PROES said:...as for concepts and views in time travel is not philosophically or logically paradoxical.
No, theorizing at time travel isn't based on quantum mechanics and particle physics, it's based on general relativity, the theory of how mass and energy curves spacetime which results in the effects we call "gravity", because particles follow geodesic paths, which are the closest equivalent to "straight lines" in curved spacetime. If you're not familiar with these ideas you could check out the series of introductory pages http://www.aei.mpg.de/einsteinOnline/en/elementary/generalRT/index.html in such spacetimes shows that there's no reason this need lead to any logical paradoxes (as was discussed earlier in the thread). If we want to discuss time travel on this forum we should probably stick to discussing ideas like these, since GR seems to be the only existing theory of physics which allows for the possibility.MM PROES said:Time travel was originally thought impossible. Now with quantum mechanics and particle physics, it is theorized.
Last edited by a moderator: