Time travel in the quantum world

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the claim made by physicist Antonio Zichichi regarding the possibility of individual quantum particles, such as electrons, traveling back in time. Participants emphasize the need for a credible source to substantiate this assertion, noting that the concept of time travel for particles is often misunderstood. The consensus is that quantum field theory (QFT) does not support the idea of time travel, as CPT symmetry does not equate to the ability of particles to move backward in time. The thread concludes with a clear dismissal of the time travel claim based on established scientific principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with quantum field theory (QFT)
  • Knowledge of CPT symmetry in physics
  • Ability to critically evaluate scientific claims and sources
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of CPT symmetry in quantum field theory
  • Explore the concept of quantum foam and its relevance to particle behavior
  • Investigate the interpretations of time travel in theoretical physics
  • Read primary literature on statements made by physicists like Antonio Zichichi
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the theoretical implications of time travel in the quantum realm will benefit from this discussion.

Arceus
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
hi users, I'm a new member of the forum. My question is about time travel in the quantum world. I am aware of the enormous limitations, but my topic is about individual particles and their ability to travel through time, is that possible for them? My question comes from a speech by an important physicist, who states that single particles in the quantum world can go back in time for example in 2012. Obviously there is no talk of paradoxes, and he refers to the Wigner theorem
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Arceus said:
My question comes from a speech by an important physicist
Please give a more specific reference.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
Arceus said:
I'm a new member of the forum.
Welcome to PF!
 
PeterDonis said:
Welcome to PF!
Hi PeterDonis at this moment I don't have the link of the text, but it concerned an interview made by a newspaper with professor Antonio Zicchichi, maybe I didn't write the name well. This physicist claims that individual particles like an electron, can go back into the past, in my view I believe the professor was referring to quantum foam and therefore to the indeterministic nature of the quantum world. But of course I'm on this forum for more information
 
Arceus said:
at this moment I don't have the link of the text, but it concerned an interview made by a newspaper with professor Antonio Zicchichi
We can't discuss a vague second-hand report of something. We need the actual first-hand reference. If you can't provide one, we will have to close this thread.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
Arceus said:
in my view I believe the professor was referring to quantum foam and therefore to the indeterministic nature of the quantum world
Which is not at all the same thing as "time travel is possible", even for individual quantum particles. So either you are misunderstanding what the professor said, or the professor is going way beyond what the actual theory says (which, unfortunately, scientists often do in informal contexts like interviews with newspapers). It's impossible to tell which without an actual reference to what the professor said.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
PeterDonis said:
Which is not at all the same thing as "time travel is possible", even for individual quantum particles. So either you are misunderstanding what the professor said, or the professor is going way beyond what the actual theory says (which, unfortunately, scientists often do in informal contexts like interviews with newspapers). It's impossible to tell which without an actual reference to what the professor said.

PeterDonis said:
Which is not at all the same thing as "time travel is possible", even for individual quantum particles. So either you are misunderstanding what the professor said, or the professor is going way beyond what the actual theory says (which, unfortunately, scientists often do in informal contexts like interviews with newspapers). It's impossible to tell which without an actual reference to what the professor said.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.il...-non-per-noi-e-su-dio-vi-dico-che/102801/amp/

this is the link of the article, I do not speak Italian but cob the translator I was able to read what was written, and affirm that single particles can travel in the past in the quantum world. Unfortunately I don't have links in English, but using the translator you can read it. I know that in Italy this professor is very important but I don't know anything else about him.
 
He is just saying that elementary particles do not have a preference for future or past, a designated path from past to future, like classical objects do.
It's easy to confuse with particles somehow going back into past on a poorly translated page.
 
PeterDonis said:
which, unfortunately, scientists often do in informal contexts like interviews with newspapers
+1 yes they do that quite often...
 
  • #10
Jarek 31 said:
Let me remind OP's question
Which was already shown, way back in post #8, to be based on a misunderstanding of what the professor referred to actually said.

Jarek 31 said:
So please let us avoid subjective QM interpretations here, and try to answer OP's question from QFT perceptive
The question is already answered: particles can't travel back in time. QFT agrees with this. CPT symmetry is not the same thing as time travel.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
  • #11
The OP's question has been answered. Thread closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K