Time Travel: No worry about paradoxes

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of time travel, particularly focusing on the implications of traveling to the past and the associated paradoxes. Participants explore theoretical frameworks, relativity, and the potential for changing historical events without affecting the present or future. The conversation includes references to well-known thought experiments like the twin paradox and touches on quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that time travel to the past does not necessarily lead to paradoxes, arguing that timelines can exist in parallel without affecting one another.
  • Others challenge the twin paradox, claiming that the effects of acceleration and deceleration do not cancel out and that the twin who travels ages less than the one who stays behind.
  • There is a discussion about how introducing oneself into a past environment might affect the conservation of energy and mass, questioning whether time travel adds or removes energy/mass from the universe.
  • Some participants propose that traveling back in time might only allow one to revisit their own past moments, while others argue that this view requires an assumption of a second direction of time, which is not supported by current physics.
  • A participant references the quantum eraser experiment as a means to discuss retrocausality, suggesting that it challenges conventional notions of time and causation.
  • There is a philosophical inquiry into the implications of time travel on free will, questioning whether actions taken in the present are predetermined by past events.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on time travel, with no consensus reached. Some agree on the potential for parallel timelines, while others contest the implications of the twin paradox and the mechanics of time travel itself.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions regarding the nature of time, the effects of relativity, and the conservation laws of physics. The discussion remains open-ended, with unresolved questions about the mechanics of time travel and its implications.

  • #31
thomasxc said:
yeah...that would imply the universe was a being or something that had consciousness.
I'll bet that the argument for 'conspiratorial physics' attempts to sidestep the invokation of a consciousness, but I'd like to see them try. I think anyone who purports this theory has not thought it through beyond the 'makes my stomach feel good' phase.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
yeah.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K