Time Travel: No worry about paradoxes

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the implications of time travel and the associated paradoxes, particularly referencing Einstein's theory of relativity and the twin paradox. Participants argue that time travel to the past does not necessarily create paradoxes, as it may result in the formation of parallel timelines rather than altering the original timeline. The conversation highlights the conservation of mass and energy, suggesting that if time travel were possible, it would not introduce additional mass or energy into the universe. The discussion also touches on the concept of closed time-like loops and the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics as potential frameworks for understanding time travel.

PREREQUISITES
  • Einstein's theory of relativity
  • Twin paradox in physics
  • Alcubierre warp drive concept
  • Many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Einstein's theory of relativity on time travel
  • Explore the twin paradox and its resolutions in modern physics
  • Investigate the Alcubierre warp drive and its feasibility
  • Study the many-worlds interpretation and its impact on quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, science fiction writers, and anyone interested in the theoretical aspects of time travel and its implications on the universe.

  • #31
thomasxc said:
yeah...that would imply the universe was a being or something that had consciousness.
I'll bet that the argument for 'conspiratorial physics' attempts to sidestep the invokation of a consciousness, but I'd like to see them try. I think anyone who purports this theory has not thought it through beyond the 'makes my stomach feel good' phase.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
yeah.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
7K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K