Well,
@Hornbein might have a point here.
It goes without saying that AI is in its infancy, and that's certainly true in legal realms.
But there have been some early signs (and again, everything involving AI is "early" at this point in time) that AI generated works will not be afforded the same copyright protections as other works.
Here is an article as an example:
US Copyright Office: AI Generated Works Are Not Eligible for Copyright.
So what does this mean? If an image is generated by AI (not just "AI sharpened," but wholly created such as diffusion based methods discussed in several PF threads), and you get ahold of such an image, you might be able do what you will with it and nobody's really going to stop you. At least in the US.
On the other hand, if
your computer wholly generates an AI image, and some marketing department you've never heard of gets their hands on it and decides, without asking, to plaster that image on their cereal boxes, there's not much that
you can do about it either.
Here's an article that's a little more recent:
New US copyright rules protect only AI art with ‘human authorship’
So maybe it's kinda free? I speculate that rules and rights will become much less ambiguous in the coming years.