- 13,553
- 16,186
It's a sort of atom-y thing inside a speech bubble - so "talking science" or "talking about science".fresh_42 said:... and I still don't see what you mean. Could you enlighten me?
The thread invites participants to share daily lessons or interesting facts they have learned, encompassing a wide range of topics from personal experiences to historical facts, scientific insights, and humorous observations. The scope includes casual learning, trivia, and personal anecdotes.
The discussion features a variety of viewpoints and personal anecdotes, with no clear consensus on any specific topic. Participants express differing opinions and experiences, particularly regarding the effects of television and the historical context of various facts shared.
Some claims made in the discussion are based on personal experiences or anecdotal evidence, and there are instances of participants correcting or refining each other's statements without reaching a definitive conclusion.
Readers interested in casual learning, trivia, personal anecdotes, or exploring a variety of topics in a light-hearted manner may find this thread engaging.
It's a sort of atom-y thing inside a speech bubble - so "talking science" or "talking about science".fresh_42 said:... and I still don't see what you mean. Could you enlighten me?
Oh, that easy. I was looking for some message behind atoms with three valence electrons, or Lithium.Ibix said:It's a sort of atom-y thing inside a speech bubble - so "talking science" or "talking about science".
It's a good thing it wasn't a subtle message involving Uranium.fresh_42 said:I was looking for some message behind atoms with three valence electrons, or Lithium.

By the way: What do we have about the Lithium puzzle? Do we have an insight?strangerep said:It's a good thing it wasn't a subtle message involving Uranium.![]()
But that's the classical model. Is our PF a classical forum?fresh_42 said:By the way: What do we have about the Lithium puzzle? Do we have an insight?
Back in high school while coding up a lunar landing game, I first encountered that issue and learned of the alternate quadratic formula: $$x=\frac{2c}{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2-4ac}}$$ which can evade the cancellation of near equal quantities and associated loss of precision.mfb said:Today I learned that ##\frac{\sqrt{x^2+1}-1}{x} = \frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+1}+1}##. Looks funny, but it works.Found when reducing rounding errors for small x.
Context
Huh??fresh_42 said:By the way: What do we have about the Lithium puzzle? Do we have an insight?
I'm not totally sure, but isn't there a massive lack of Lithium in the universe?strangerep said:Huh??
Humans are stealing it from the universe (for their cell phones and electric cars)fresh_42 said:I'm not totally sure, but isn't there a massive lack of Lithium in the universe?
Some are stealing it for psychotic purpose too.zoki85 said:Humans are stealing it from the universe (for their cell phones and electric cars)
What does electron signifies?Ibix said:It's related to the points you get from trophies - I think estimated thresholds can be found on this thread (or at least in General Discussion) if you care to search.
And IBM employees probably use SBX.strangerep said:TIL... that some people now abbreviate Starbucks -> Sbux.
(Hence I also learned that laziness is a monotonically increasing function of time).

Is there anything less than a PF quark?Ibix said:Just that the number of trophy points you have is above a certain value. You probably got an alert about a trophy, for replying or posting a certain number of times or whatever. Noting that you have 22 trophy points, I guess "electron" is 20+. As I say, someone reverse engineered it - search General Discussion for posts containing ocean and mountain.
Edit: it doesn't mean we think negatively of you...![]()
Here's the list that was reverse engineered. Presuming you can't get negative trophy points, I think the answer is no.epenguin said:Is there anything less than a PF quark?