Today I Learned
- Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
- Start date
Click For Summary
Discussion Overview
The thread invites participants to share daily lessons or interesting facts they have learned, encompassing a wide range of topics from personal experiences to historical facts, scientific insights, and humorous observations. The scope includes casual learning, trivia, and personal anecdotes.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Conceptual clarification
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- Some participants share personal insights, such as learning about the cleaning of hats or the time spent with medical specialists.
- Others discuss historical techniques like "oyster veneering" and its revival, with one participant clarifying it is not a food-preparation method.
- Mathematical observations are made regarding factorials, specifically that 23! has 23 digits, with some participants exploring the implications of this coincidence.
- Several participants mention humorous or trivial facts, such as the number of microbes transferred in a kiss or the age of Cambridge University compared to the Aztecs.
- Some participants express personal reflections on learning new words or concepts, such as "hyperacusis" and its effects on their music-making.
- There are repeated claims about the impact of television on body image, with some participants sharing personal experiences related to this topic.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
The discussion features a variety of viewpoints and personal anecdotes, with no clear consensus on any specific topic. Participants express differing opinions and experiences, particularly regarding the effects of television and the historical context of various facts shared.
Contextual Notes
Some claims made in the discussion are based on personal experiences or anecdotal evidence, and there are instances of participants correcting or refining each other's statements without reaching a definitive conclusion.
Who May Find This Useful
Readers interested in casual learning, trivia, personal anecdotes, or exploring a variety of topics in a light-hearted manner may find this thread engaging.
- 3,796
- 3,067
I can recall seeing the premier of The Flintstones.OmCheeto said:TIL that I'm(b. May 1959) older than lasers(b. May 1960).
Twasn't quite as bad as when I learned I was older than the Flintstones(b. Sept 1960).
- 69
- 125
I learned this by searching for text phrases and having Google proffer up links with the search-for-phrase highlighted.jack action said:TIL I learn about linking directly to a specific portion of text in a web document, without requiring the author to annotate it with an ID (only Firefox doesn't support it). The following is an example:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Text_fragments#:~:text=The syntax, follows:
- 3,677
- 5,847
- 3,796
- 3,067
- 3,796
- 3,067
- 3,796
- 3,067
- 3,766
- 2,214
Sheesh! How much time do the candidates get for this exam?pinball1970 said:You seen this guy? He works through past [Oxford Entry] exam papers.
- 3,677
- 5,847
2 hours 30strangerep said:Sheesh! How much time do the candidates get for this exam?
https://www.ox.ac.uk/admissions/undergraduate/applying-to-oxford/guide/admissions-tests/mat
- 3,677
- 5,847
It is Oxford so to be expected, like Harvard, MIT and the like? They are ranked high so they want to attract the gifted youngsters.pinball1970 said:
Put them under pressure a bit?
Cannot be anywhere near those Math Olympiad trials and competitions in terms of pressure. That is crazy at such a young age.
- 2,746
- 12,006
Eric Asimov (son of Issac and NY Times wine guy) wrote an article about it.
Here are some excerpts:
Cannabis is legal for recreational use in 22 states, two territories and Washington, D.C. Cannabis for medical use is permitted in 38 states. It can be sold as chocolates and gummy candies, in nonalcoholic beverages and in creams and rubs. Fine chefs prepare cannabis cuisine. Yet the addition of cannabis to any commercially available alcoholic beverage is strictly prohibited.
The main reason is that cannabis is still illegal federally. As the federal government licenses alcoholic products and wineries, commercial production of weed wine cannot be licensed by the states.
Even states that have legalized marijuana prohibit the blending of two different intoxicants, like alcohol and cannabis. Stores that are licensed to sell alcohol are prohibited from selling cannabis, and vice versa.
While cannabis-infused wines or beers are sold commercially, it’s in name only. These beverages are made with drinks that have been dealcoholized.
While the method is uncomplicated, it permits myriad variations, depending on a winemaker’s intent and appetite for experimentation. Simply add cannabis to grape juice as it begins to ferment. The process of fermentation produces heat, which extracts the active ingredients, largely THC, which causes the buzz, and cannabidiol, or CBD, which has a relaxing effect.
Winemakers can choose to add the weed early, allowing it to steep in the juice before fermentation begins, and they can allow the wine to age on the cannabis lees, or remnants, after fermentation, both of which will add aromas and flavors.
He says it is now becoming less popular due to other eatables which are very easy to get.
(I had some great Baklava at a Dead concert once.)
- 1,047
- 786
- 3,766
- 2,214
I was surprised, and a bit depressed, to find that although I knew immediately how to do (almost) every problem, I kept making silly mistakes when I tried to write out the full solution by hand. I'm so used to doing everything directly in latex, which eliminates a plethora of silly line-to-line copying errors. I'm also accustomed now to looking up (almost) every elementary formula instead of relying of memory (e.g., for trig identities). <Sigh>pinball1970 said:It is Oxford so to be expected, like Harvard, MIT and the like? They are ranked high so they want to attract the gifted youngsters.

Hmm. At that age, my self-assured arrogance used to compensate totally for any feeling of anxiety. I never once felt under pressure in any exam (even when I was the only one in my class who managed to complete the final year-12 science exam). If I tried to do a serious exam now under time pressure I'd probably collapse with a heart attack.pinball1970 said:Put them under pressure a bit?
Cannot be anywhere near those Math Olympiad trials and competitions in terms of pressure. That is crazy at such a young age.
- 54
- 46
Szilard letter was signed on August 2nd 1939,
Wow, that was before
Yeah, yeah, I know. It was Einstein name there all along.
Then it intrigued me to search when was Manhattan Project started.
And it was in 1942. January 19th to be exact as FDR signed the Atomic Bomb Project.
And also from that link I search "Oppenheimer" name. It first comes up at July 1942.
Leslie Groves name, September 1942.
So what's taking FDR so long to start that project. When he had Pearl Harbor??
Btw, the United States have had Pearl Harbor since 19th century, if you know what I mean.
- 49,547
- 25,649
It didn't. By early 1940 the US government already had researchers working on nuclear fission. What took until January 1942 was doing enough research to show that an atomic bomb was a real possibility--enough of one to justify a full-on effort to design, produce, test, and deploy bombs.KingGambit said:So what's taking FDR so long to start that project.
- 54
- 46
Oh, that.PeterDonis said:It didn't. By early 1940 the US government already had researchers working on nuclear fission...
And thanks for the information.
I'm aware of Szilard - Einstein letter. I thought the letter was written after Germany invaded Poland, and not before Pearl Harbor, somewhere in 1940. And then I thought that the US Government appointed Leslie Groves a few days later and then Groves approached Oppenheimer, and all this before attack on Pearl Harbor.
And in my opinion regarding US government attitude in WW 2, is that the US gorvernment had tooo much waiting.
Germany had launched blitzkrieg, Benelux fell in three weeks. And in June 1st 1940, German soldiers marched in Paris. V2 had been raining on London and other cities, still the US Gorvernment only gave UK lend lease.
But after the attack on Pearl Harbor, US declared war on Japan and Hitler declared war on US (fortunately), and Churchill declared war on Japan, etc... and then we had D-Day operation. (Neptune)
- 54
- 46
And I come accross this video today.
Today I learned that Oppenheimer quotes "I'm the destoyer of the world..." long after Trinity Test.
All these years I thought Oppenheimer said "I become death, the destroyer of the world" right after Trinity Test, countdown to zero. How arrogant.
But, no. Oppenheimer still the introvert scientist who dedicated his work in science.
And he quoted Bhagavad Gita, I think in the 60's, judging by his face.
He said this not out of pride or arrogance, but out of exasperation, that the FBI suspected him and interrogated him to be a communist agent.
Okay, so what, I'm the destroyer of the world. Confiscate me, arrrest me!
Oppenheimer, "... a few people laughed, a few people cried, most people were silent. I remembered the line from the Hindu scripture, Bhagavad Gita, Vishnu is trying to persuade the prince that he should do his duty. And to impress him takes on his multiarmed form and says: 'Now I am become death the destroyer of the worlds.' I suppose we all thought that one way or another'"
- 54
- 46
Perhaps I was wrong.KingGambit said:Oppenheimer, "... a few people laughed, a few people cried, most people were silent. I remembered the line from the Hindu scripture, Bhagavad Gita, Vishnu is trying to persuade the prince that he should do his duty. And to impress him takes on his multiarmed form and says: 'Now I am become death the destroyer of the worlds.' I suppose we all thought that one way or another'"
If I have to interprete his quotes.
"Vishnu is trying to persuade the prince."
And I think Vishnu in this context is Krishna, one of Vishnu Avatar.
Bhagavad Gita is a conversation between Arjuna and Krishna. So the "prince" in this quotes is Arjuna.
Yes, Arjuna has some doubt that he has to fight his brothers (Kurava, 100 princess and 1 princest). But Krishna (Vishnu) assured Arjuna that what Arjuna fight are not his brothers but the evils.
Perhaps this what Oppenheimer trying to say.
That Oppenheimer (not as Vishnu, the destroyer of the world. But as Arjuna, the prince), that he/Oppenheimer should do his duty, because I am (Krishna) is the destroyer of the worlds.
And all Arjuna does is only his duty.
And as Oppenheimer himself, I myself reads Mahabharata a lot.
- 49,547
- 25,649
No, it was written on August 2, 1939, according to Wikipedia [1]. Germany invaded Poland on September 1, 1939.KingGambit said:I'm aware of Szilard - Einstein letter. I thought the letter was written after Germany invaded Poland
No, Groves was not appointed to head the Manhattan Project until September 1942, according to Wikipedia [2].KingGambit said:And then I thought that the US Government appointed Leslie Groves a few days later and then Groves approached Oppenheimer, and all this before attack on Pearl Harbor.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein–Szilard_letter
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leslie_Groves
- 49,547
- 25,649
What you quoted is Oppenheimer recalling the Trinity test. Whether he actually said "I am become death, the destroyer of worlds" out loud at that time is, I believe, a matter of some debate (other witnesses who were present and nearby differ about what they did or didn't hear him say), but it seems clear that he had the thoughts he describes at the time, not just decades later.KingGambit said:Perhaps I was wrong.
- 49,547
- 25,649
A good discussion of what the quote might actually mean is in this article:KingGambit said:If I have to interprete his quotes.
https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2014/05/23/oppenheimer-gita/
The article is from Alex Wellerstein's blog Nuclear Secrecy, which is worth reading for much more than just this article.
- 3,163
- 3,748
Thanks for that link, @PeterDonis . That blog had dropped off my list.PeterDonis said:A good discussion of what the quote might actually mean is in this article:
https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2014/05/23/oppenheimer-gita/
The article is from Alex Wellerstein's blog Nuclear Secrecy, which is worth reading for much more than just this article.
- 2,746
- 12,006
- 23,200
- 7,681
Yep. The public didn't want to help The United Kingdom. It was all that Roosevelt could do just to get Lend Lease passed. We were very 'isolationist' at the time.KingGambit said:Germany had launched blitzkrieg, Benelux fell in three weeks. And in June 1st 1940, German soldiers marched in Paris. V2 had been raining on London and other cities, still the US Gorvernment only gave UK lend lease.
- 1,047
- 786
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wire_wheel
- 69
- 125
Indeed yes.PeterDonis said:It didn't. By early 1940 the US government already had researchers working on nuclear fission. What took until January 1942 was doing enough research to show that an atomic bomb was a real possibility--enough of one to justify a full-on effort to design, produce, test, and deploy bombs.
I think it's actually in the letter that a snip is posted here that the "lore" at the time was that a uranium-based bomb was possible but might require something that could only be delivered by an ocean ship. They were thinking it might require something like a reactor, and so many many tons of material. So at the time of the letter, folks were thinking that it would be a pretty drastic increase in destructive capability, but they didn't quite have a handle on how drastic. They were thinking in terms of bringing a barge into a harbor and wiping out the harbor. Nobody was thinking airplane delivery.
But there was a lot of research going on. And presently the lore changed to something a little more accurate. An airplane delivered device seemed possible.
Plus, various hints were coming out the NAZIs and Japan had their programs. This worried a lot of people. It turned out that the NAZIs were not as far along as was feared. And Japan was even farther behind. Turns out that getting your city bombed frequently makes it tough to construct precision scientific equipment. But it was not possible to be sure of that.
- 16,031
- 7,910
https://www.thedrive.com/news/south-carolina-latest-to-ban-notorious-carolina-squat-truck-mod
- 3,796
- 3,067
Murray Gell-Mann got involved in advising about anti-ballistic missiles. He found them destabilizing. At a conference an official of the USSR, Millionshchikov, sought him out. This man told Murray that the people of Moscow wanted the ABM, destabilizing or not. He said, if we do not put up this system then we would not get a single vote in the next election.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DzFw2d2YHCU
- 2,746
- 12,006
Reminds me of a ciliate:
- 3,677
- 5,847
https://phys.org/news/2023-05-unique-bawdy-bard-revealing-15th-century.html
Similar threads
- Replies
- 26
- Views
- 6K
- · Replies 161 ·
- Replies
- 161
- Views
- 15K
- · Replies 4 ·
- Replies
- 4
- Views
- 2K
- · Replies 9 ·
- Replies
- 9
- Views
- 2K
- · Replies 3 ·
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 3K
- · Replies 14 ·
- Replies
- 14
- Views
- 2K
- · Replies 27 ·
- Replies
- 27
- Views
- 6K
- · Replies 5 ·
- Replies
- 5
- Views
- 2K
- · Replies 3 ·
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 2K
- · Replies 5 ·
- Replies
- 5
- Views
- 4K