- 20,627
- 27,781
TIL a nice expression in integration: "If nothing works, use the substitution of desperation, the entire denominator."
You're the captain! ...CaptainAmerica17 said:TIL about personal responsibility. It's not fun cramming for school projects when the end of the semester is in a month and a half. Now I'm doing stress-relief math at 2 am.
Stavros Kiri said:You're the captain! ...
Demystifier said:"Bohemian rhapsody"
Keep it up! ...CaptainAmerica17 said:With great power comes great responsibility!
Exactly. And I could amuse myself by reading PF etc. on my phone while waiting.DaveC426913 said:I am confused.
1] What does a cell phone have to do with the lot? I'm guessing you can wait there and have the arriver call when he's coming out?
I had to drive into the entrance to investigate. It was actually "carved out" from part of a paid parking lot, using a fence. The paid part required driving through a gate; the cell phone part didn't. A sign stated that one could park in the cell phone lot for up to 30 minutes, and the vehicle must be attended at all times.2] What about 'cell phone lot' made you realize it would be free?
Who knows, may be in the future (e.g. with 5G net, coordinated autonomous vehicles and planes, intenet of things etc.) we could even have more drive-through and drive-in services and facilities at airports, such as e.g. drive though check in (and baggage check in), drive through baggage claim, drive in waiting lot and check in and ticket issue automatically via the inernet, from your car, with smartphone or computer and portable printers ...jtbell said:Along the entrance road, I saw a sign, "Cell Phone Lot." Aha! I could park there for free, wait for my guest to text me his location at the curb in front of the terminal after he arrived and picked up his bags, and then simply zip over to the terminal. This is not a huge airport like Chicago O'Hare, so just 2-3 minutes after his text, we were on our way.
I see some problems there. A lot of the red tape in airports is redundancy is passive security - such as physically clapping eyes on who is picking up the tickets, and who is dropping off luggage. Every monitored checkpoint is another place where ne'er-do-wells can get caught.Stavros Kiri said:Who knows, may be in the future (e.g. with 5G net, coordinated autonomous vehicles and planes, intenet of things etc.) we could even have more drive-through and drive-in services and facilities at airports, such as e.g. drive though check in (and baggage check in), drive through baggage claim, drive in waiting lot and check in and ticket issue automatically via the inernet, from your car, with smartphone or computer and portable printers ...
That would save time waiting in lines, or cut down on the suggested "2 hours in advance" ...
We could even see drive-through boarding on planes (in connection to the former drive through check in and baggage ...).
All that, of course, before we are all able to have our own "flying vehicles" ...
Security is one problem. I am sure there are others too. I was planning to mention it but at the end I forgot. However, the same issue is central with a 5G net and internet of things, which they are currently working to improve (security). The red tape for security could (potentially) get alleviated, and more advanced sensors etc. would be designed for the drive-through purposes, I guess.DaveC426913 said:I see some problems there. A lot of the red tape in airports is redundancy is passive security - such as physically clapping eyes on who is picking up the tickets, and who is dropping off luggage. Every monitored checkpoint is another place where ne'er-do-wells can get caught.
While it would be freakin' awesome to drop my luggage straight from my trunk to the conveyor, I'm not sure it's worth the security risk.
Imagine that I had been of the firm opinion - before 9/11! - that flying takes too long, especially on shuttle routes like London - *. I seriously thought that it should become like a bus trip sooner or later. Why should it take hours to check in on a flight that lasts no longer than 3 hours? On highly frequently routes I thought: "arrival at the airport - buy the ticket - check in - board" should be a matter of ten minutes! E.g. if you have a look on the passengers on a Monday morning between London and Frankfurt, then you will see: they do not fly, they commute!DaveC426913 said:While it would be freakin' awesome to drop my luggage straight from my trunk to the conveyor, I'm not sure it's worth the security risk.
Boarding alone takes longer than that unless it is a really small plane.fresh_42 said:On highly frequently routes I thought: "arrival at the airport - buy the ticket - check in - board" should be a matter of ten minutes!
If the airplane makes multiple stops on the way to your destination you lose much more time. You want a direct flight, or at least just 2-3 flights for more complicated trips.fresh_42 said:boarding (5m - since there is no need to board all at once!)
I would agree with that.pinball1970 said:I am studying abiogenesis at the mo and I decided to find a decent biology forum. First page I went to recommended...you guessed it. Physics forums!
While 'cow facial and waxing' I'm sure already existed ...jtbell said:Today I learned about a new tool for dairy farmers: facial recognition for cows.
I bet it doesn't use just the faces.
Yet another example of where you can end up with a physics Ph.D.![...] Cainthus's head of product science [...] grew up in Brooklyn, earned a Ph.D. in high-energy physics from Yale, and spent five years smashing subatomic particles at CERN's Large Hadron Collider, in Switzerland. She is now a student of cow behavior.
Yup! There's a second brain down there! ...skyshrimp said:TIL that there are as may neurons in the human intestine as there are in a cat's brain.
References please.skyshrimp said:It seems that vertebrates are evolved worms.
Fishes, not worms.skyshrimp said:It seems that vertebrates are evolved worms.
I didn't find any publications there.skyshrimp said:Look in the belly.
mfb said:"Worm" is a poorly defined group
OmCheeto said:So spare a thought for the leaping blenny, which detests the sea so much, it chooses to live in miniature cave three feet above the tide-line in Guam, Micronesia, and scampers to higher ground when it notices even the smallest wave approaching.
Or the second...mfb said:Give the fish a few million years more (and no human influence) and it becomes more adapted to life on land.
Wouldn't be the first time...
Is this for real?mfb said:Today I learned about a curious nearly-pattern in the decimal system:
##10^{14}-1 = 909,091 \times 109, 999,989##
##10^{24}-1 = 99,990,001 \times 9,901 \times 1, 010,099, 989,899##
##10^{36}-1 = 999,999, 000,001 \times 9,901 \times 100, 999,999, 999,999, 999,899##
##10^{38}-1 = 909,090,909,090,909,091 \times 109, 999,999, 999,999, 999,989##
##10^{39}-1 = 900,900,900,900,990,990,990,991 \times 1,109, 999,999 ,999,889##
##10^{48}-1 = 9,999, 999,900, 000,001 \times 99, 990,001 \times 1, 000,100, 009,999, 999,899 ,989,999##
##10^{62}-1 = 909,090,909,090,909,090,909,090,909,091 \times 109 ,999,999 ,999,999 ,999,999 ,999,999, 999,989##
##10^{72}-1 = 999999 000001 \times 99 990001 \times 9901 \times 101 \times 10,000, 999,999 ,989,998, 989,999 ,010,001, 010,000, 999,999 ,989,999##
##10^{78}-1 = 900,900, 900,900, 990,990, 990,991 \times 1 ,109,999, 999,999, 889,000, 000,000, 000,000 ,000,000 ,001,109, 999,999 ,999,889##
The numbers get too large for an exhaustive search, but two larger examples:
##10^{93}-1 = 900,900,900,900,900,900,900,900,900,900,990,990,990,990,990,990,990,990,990,991 \times 1,109,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,889##
##10^{196}-1 = 999,999,999,999,990,000,000,000,000,099,999,999,999,999,000,000,000,000,009,999,999,999,999,900,000,000,000,001 \times 900,900,900,900,990,990,990,991 \times 11,099, 999,999 ,999,000 ,999,999 ,999,988, 900,000, 000,011 ,099,999, 999,999, 000,999, 999,999 ,988,900 ,000,000, 011,099 ,999,999##
In each case all factors apart from the last one are prime numbers.
Thanks for the tips.mfb said:You can check them with WolframAlpha or Dario Alpern's tool (which I used for factorization).
I got the idea from unique primes: If a prime is a unique prime with a period length p, then it is the largest factor of 10p-1.
I am beginning to see the mechanism nowmfb said:I got the idea from unique primes: If a prime is a unique prime with a period length p, then it is the largest factor of 10p-1.