MHB Tom's question at Yahoo Answers regarding proof by induction

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Proof
Click For Summary
The original question posed by Tom regarding the proof by induction was based on a false statement, which was likely a typo. The corrected problem involves proving that the sum of the first n odd numbers equals n^2 + 2n. The proof by induction begins with verifying the base case, followed by establishing the induction hypothesis and deriving the case for n+1. The proof is completed by showing that the formula holds for all integers n through the inductive step. Participants are encouraged to engage further with proof by induction problems in designated math forums.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Proove the following by mathematical induction?

while justifying your supporting arguments using the language of proof coherently, concisely and logically.
3 + 7 + 11 + 15 + ... to n terms = 2n^2 +n

Here is a link to the question:

Proove the following by mathematical induction? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Tom,

The statement as given is not true, so I assume it is a typo, and instead the problem should be as follows.

We are given to prove by induction the following:

$$\sum_{i=1}^n(2i+1)=n^2+2n$$

Step 1: demonstrate the base case $P_1$ is true:

$$\sum_{i=1}^1(2k+1)=(1)^2+2(1)$$

$$2(1)+1=1+2(1)$$

This is true.

Step 2: state the induction hypothesis $P_k$:

$$\sum_{i=1}^k(2k+1)=k^2+2k$$

Step 3: derive $P_{k+1}$ from $P_k$ to complete the proof by induction.

Let our inductive step be to add $$2(k+1)+1$$ to both sides of $P_k$:

$$\sum_{i=1}^k(2k+1)+2(k+1)+1=k^2+2k+2(k+1)+1$$

$$\sum_{i=1}^{k+1}(2k+1)=k^2+2k+1+2(k+1)$$

$$\sum_{i=1}^{k+1}(2k+1)=(k+1)^2+2(k+1)$$

We have derived $P_{k+1}$ from $P_{k}$ thereby completing the proof by induction.

To Tom or any other guests viewing this topic, I invite and encourage you to register and post other proof by induction problems either in our http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f21/ or http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f15/ forums depending on the nature of the problem, or course from which it is given.

Best Regards,

Mark.
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K