Topological Quantum Field Theory: Help reading a paper

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the interpretation of Quantum Hilbert Spaces in the context of Topological Quantum Field Theory (TQFT), specifically referencing the paper linked from the University of Texas. The user seeks clarification on the notation for the Quantum Hilbert Spaces, denoted as ##E(Y)## and ##E(\partial X)##, where ##Y## represents a space and ##X## represents a spacetime. The user confirms that elements of ##E(Y)## are indeed ##L^2## functions mapping from ##Y## to the real numbers, ##\mathbb{R}##. The distinction between the notations ##E(Y)## and ##E(\partial X)## is acknowledged but ultimately resolved by the user.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Hilbert Spaces
  • Familiarity with Topological Quantum Field Theory (TQFT)
  • Knowledge of notation in mathematical physics
  • Basic concepts of functional analysis, specifically ##L^2## spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Quantum Hilbert Spaces in TQFT
  • Explore the implications of boundary conditions in quantum field theories
  • Learn about path integrals and their role in TQFT
  • Review the mathematical foundations of ##L^2## functions and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and students in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on Quantum Field Theory and its topological aspects.

nateHI
Messages
145
Reaction score
4
https://www.ma.utexas.edu/users/dafr/OldTQFTLectures.pdf

I'm reading the paper linked above (page 10) and have a simple question about notation and another that's more of a sanity check. Given a space ##Y## and a spacetime ##X## the author talks about the associated Quantum Hilbert Spaces ##E(Y)## and ##E(\partial X)##.

The Simple Question: Elements of ##E(Y)## are just ##L^2## functions ##f:Y\to \mathbb{R}## right?

The Sanity Check: If ##X## is the spacetime and ##Y## the space then ##Y## is the boundary of ##X##. So why the different notations when talking about the Hilbert space ##E(Y)## itself and the other ##E(\partial X)## when talking about path integrals?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can disregard this question. I figured it out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K