Topology of punctured plane vs topology of circle?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nonequilibrium
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Plane Topology
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the relationship between the topology of the punctured plane (R^n minus the origin) and the topology of the (n-1)-dimensional sphere. Participants examine concepts such as homotopy equivalence and the implications of these topological structures.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the topology of R^n minus the origin is similar to that of an (n-1)-dimensional sphere with finite thickness and open edges, questioning if they can be considered approximately the same topology-wise.
  • Another participant introduces the concepts of homotopy equivalence and deformation retractions as relevant to the discussion.
  • A further contribution states that a homotopy induces isomorphisms of fundamental groups and homology groups, while noting that the cutsets of the two spaces differ, indicating they are not homeomorphic.
  • One participant expresses gratitude for the suggestions, indicating that the concept of homotopy equivalence clarified their understanding.
  • Another participant claims that one topology is equivalent to the product of the other with the real line.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the equivalence of the topologies, with some suggesting similarities and others emphasizing differences, particularly regarding homeomorphism and cutsets. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific topological properties and relationships, but the discussion does not resolve the implications of these properties fully, leaving some assumptions and definitions unaddressed.

nonequilibrium
Messages
1,412
Reaction score
2
So how does the topology of R^n minus the origin relate to that of the (n-1)-dimensional sphere?

I would think the topology of the former is equivalent to that of an (n-1)-dimensional sphere with finite thickness, and open edges. But I suppose that is as close as one can get to the (n-1)-dimensional sphere itself? Hm, they seem pretty similar, but not the same... Is there a way in which they are approximately the same topology-wise?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check out homotopy equivalence and deformation retractions.
 
Yes; a homotopy induces an isomorphism of fundamental groups and homology groups:

by functoriality of induced maps , if fg=IdX and gf=IdY , then

(fg)* =f*g* =IdX* , and

same idea for (gf)*. Then the induced maps are isomorphisms.

Still, note that the cutsets of the two are different, so that they are not homeomorphic

(tho maybe the fact that the standard map from R^2\{0| is infinite-to-one may give a clue

of this..
 
Hey, thank you both. Micromass' suggestion made me look up stuff that indirectly made me understand Bacle's post (and more). The homotopy equivalence of spaces is what I was looking for :)
 
one has the same topology as the product of the other with the real line.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
8K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K