Torque to lift object by cable on a drum accelerating

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the torque required to lift a 1000 kg object using a steel cable wound around a drum with a diameter of 2.5 m. The correct torque value is determined to be 13.8 kNm, which accounts for both the tension in the cable and the torque needed to accelerate the drum. The textbook answer of 11.2 kNm is identified as incorrect due to a potential oversight in calculating the torque from the tension. Key equations used include the tension formula, moment of inertia, and the relationship between linear and angular acceleration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law of motion
  • Familiarity with torque and moment of inertia concepts
  • Knowledge of angular acceleration and its relation to linear acceleration
  • Basic proficiency in physics equations related to rotational dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of torque from tension in cables
  • Learn about moment of inertia for different shapes, including solid and thin-walled cylinders
  • Explore the relationship between linear and angular motion in rotational systems
  • Investigate common mistakes in physics textbooks regarding torque calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators looking for practical examples of torque calculations in rotational dynamics.

swotty
Messages
4
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


An object of mass 1000 kg is lifted by means of a steel lifting cable being wound round a drum of diameter 2.5m mounted on a horizontal shaft. The drum and shaft have a mass of 1000 kg and a radius of gyration of 1.0 m. What is the torque required to give the object an upward acceleration of 0.75 m/s^2

Homework Equations



Tension in cable ##Fc=mg + ma##
Moment of inertia ##I=mk^2##
Torque ##T=I\alpha=Fr##
Linear acceleration ##a=r\alpha##

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
My problem is I don't get the answer given in the textbook. Which is 11.2 kNm. I always assume at first that I have missed something. But I've tried various tacks and still do not get this answer. Am I missing something?

Here is my calculations:

Tension in cable due to mass of object and acceleration upwards:

$$F_{c}=1000\times9.81 + 1000\times0.75$$
$$=10560N$$

Torque on rim of drum to create tension:
$$T_1=Fc\times r $$##(r=radius of drum)##
$$T_1=10560\times 1.25$$
$$=13.2\times10^3 Nm$$
Torque to accelerate drum:
$$T_2=I\times\alpha$$
$$I=1000\times 1^2=1000 kg m^2$$
acceleration Angular
$$\alpha = a/r$$
$$ \alpha =0.75/1.25$$
$$\alpha = 0.6 rad/s^2$$
$$T_2=1000\times0.6$$
$$T_2=600Nm$$
Total Torque to accelerate drum and object:
$$T_n=T_1+T_2$$
$$T_n=13.2\times10^3+600$$
$$T_n=13.8kNm$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't find any problem with what you did. I think they came up with 11.2 because they forgot to multiply the tension in the rope by the radius. In other words, they used tension instead of torque when summing torques. Then again, I ran through this pretty quickly myself.
 
Many thanks Tom for quick reply. I thought I was right but human nature being what it is you expect someone who has written a textbook will get it write. I should learn though it's happened to me before.
Regards
Glyn
 
Yes, they do make mistakes sometimes. But I try to not be too hard on them. I make lost of mistakes. :)

By the way, welcome to Physics Forums.
 
Thanks for the welcome and yes I too make loads of them hence write above instead of right
This question also does not specify information about the construction of the drum i.e. whether the drum is solid or a thin walled cylinder which changes the answer of course. I do a bit of part time teaching and I wanted to use this as a homework exercise. I think I will but with some modification
 
TomHart said:
they forgot to multiply the tension in the rope by the radius.
Or perhaps they used the radius of gyration instead of the drum radius.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TomHart
haruspex said:
Or perhaps they used the radius of gyration instead of the drum radius.
I didn't think about that, but that seems more likely.
 
Yes that's a possibility, the numbers give 11.16kNm but the radius of gyration is used to find the torque to accelerate the drum; the tension acts at the rim and therefore the couple is tension times the radius of the drum i.e. 1.25m
 
swotty said:
Yes that's a possibility, the numbers give 11.16kNm but the radius of gyration is used to find the torque to accelerate the drum; the tension acts at the rim and therefore the couple is tension times the radius of the drum i.e. 1.25m
Oh yes, yours is definitely the right answer.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K