Torque transmitted through a helix angle?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between torque applied at a radius of a screw and the linear resultant force, particularly focusing on the influence of the helix angle. Participants explore mathematical relationships and ratios involved in screw mechanics, considering factors such as pitch and circumference.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks to understand how the helix angle affects the output force as a multiplier, considering torque input through a handle.
  • Another participant suggests that the ratio of circular movement to linear movement (25.1327412mm to 2.5mm) could be used to determine an output force multiplier of 10.05.
  • A later reply confirms that if the velocity ratio is 1/10, the output force would increase tenfold, referencing the law of conservation of energy.
  • One participant raises a concern about friction, noting that it can significantly affect torque consumption, especially in the absence of ball bearings.
  • Another participant acknowledges the omission of friction for mathematical proof and expresses interest in how the helix angle might be included in calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relevance of the helix angle in calculations, with some suggesting it is significant while others question its importance. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the precise role of the helix angle in determining output force.

Contextual Notes

Participants omit friction from their calculations for the sake of mathematical exploration, which may limit the applicability of their conclusions. The discussion also highlights the dependence on specific definitions of terms such as torque, force, and helix angle.

Hutch
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi all, my first post here,
I've succumbed to some help if possible, i know its wrong but it's getting my goat! now, and many times in years gone by.

I am building something as always, and reverse engineering exisiting drive components to select suitable new ones if that makes sense. In particular I am looking at a screw helix mathemtically (trying). or should i say just a screw.

what i want know is the relationship between :

the torque applied at a radius of a screw,
and the linear resultant force.


taking into consideration of course the helix angle, or i think, the helix angle. as that has a relationship with the force output, through an angle.

for instance, a screw thread with diameter 8 and a lead (pitch) of 2.5 between threads. using the trig formula

inv tan = opp / ADJ

and modifying slightly to add 'pi' , as the helix angle is using one full circumfrence of the screw against one pitch. and we are not working in 2d anymore.

inv tan = ( opp / pi.ADJ )

torque1.JPG


torque2.JPG


gives a helix angle of 5.68 degrees, great, the helix angle.

now,
what i would like to know is how does that helix angle now affect the output force as a multiplier, forgiving friction, with regard to what is input (torque/any) through the handle
.
i can see it is a ratio, and it changes uniformly, it is a decimal number, a mutliplier, how is the geometrical ratio now expressed?, how much force is output through a helix angle, any!.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
bieng as the screw moved 2.5mm of linear movement for a total circular movement of 25.1327412mm , is that not proportional to the output ratio in itself? 25.1327412/2.5 = 10.05 would then an input force be multiplied by this 10.05 ratio to give what's output?

i.e 10nm torque input on the short handle = (10N x 0.125M ) = 1.25Nm at the handle

multiplied by 10.05 = 12.56N output?
 
Hutch said:
bieng as the screw moved 2.5mm of linear movement for a total circular movement of 25.1327412mm , is that not proportional to the output ratio in itself? 25.1327412/2.5 = 10.05 would then an input force be multiplied by this 10.05 ratio to give what's output?

i.e 10nm torque input on the short handle = (10N x 0.125M ) = 1.25Nm at the handle

multiplied by 10.05 = 12.56N output?

correct, if velocity ratio comes out to be 1/10 (use law of conservation of energy), the force at output increases ten folds
 
I hope your spindle has balls. If not, friction consumes much more torque than pitch does.
 
friction is omitted purposely from the assumption, (read 1st post) there are no balls at this stage, Its just for proving the maths, thanks by the way.

i find it interesting that force output through a screw can be calculated with the ratio of the pitch (distance traveled axially) to the circumfrence (work done in one turn), I guess those two factors produce a ratio, of course, and also a helix angle.

is there not a way that you can include the helix angle into a calculation? or is it irrelevant?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
18K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
13K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K