TheStatutoryApe
- 296
- 4
mheslep said:Yes, agreed this is about applicability of the art. 4 categories. So then you would agree that not every combatant out of uniform(b), with no military accountability(a), and hiding a suicide bomb under his cloak (c,d) requires a tribunal under the GC? That there are clear, easy to observe cases of Art 4 categories? We may still choose to treat combatants behaving in this way as POWs, but I assert the GC does not always require it.
It seems that you missed something in my reasoning. You seem to interpret article 5 as referring to doubt of exclusion as opposed to doubt of inclusion. I am holding that it is obviously the latter.