Total energy of a wave on a string

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of the total energy of a wave on a string, where the user derived an expression yielding a coefficient of 2, while the book's answer key states it should be 4. The user initially overlooked the importance of the length of the wave train, which is crucial for calculating total energy. It was clarified that the total energy depends on the number of cycles in the wave train, which was indicated in the problem statement but not initially considered. The user acknowledged this oversight and recognized the need to account for the complete problem context. Understanding the relationship between wave cycles and total energy is essential for accurate calculations.
Brian_D
Gold Member
Messages
77
Reaction score
16
Homework Statement
Consider a wave train propagating as a sine wave along a string. Obtain an expression for the total energy in this wave train, in terms of the string tension F, the wave amplitude A and the wavelength lambda.
Relevant Equations
##\mathit{total} \mathit{energy} \mathit{of} a \mathit{wave}= 0.5 \mu A^{2} \omega^{2} \lambda##

##\mu =\frac{F}{V^{2}}##

##\omega =\frac{2 \pi\mathrm{V}}{\lambda}##
P.S. I tried to clean up this post, but the program does not seem to be working correctly. When I click on "preview" I get one thing, but when I go back to my original text, it does not match the preview.
I plugged the expressions for mu and omega into the equation for total energy and simplified. I got ##\textit{total\_}\mathit{energy}=\frac{2 \pi^{2} A^{2} F}{\lambda}##. However, the book answer key says, ##\textit{total\_}\mathit{energy}=\frac{4 \pi^{2} A^{2} F}{\lambda}##. (The book gives 4 as the coefficient, not 2). Is the answer key wrong? If not, where was my mistake.I talenergyofawave=0.5μA2ω2
ω=2πVλ
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Brian_D said:
Relevant Equations: total energy of a wave ## = 0.5 \mu A^{2} \omega^{2} \lambda##
This expression does not give the total energy of a wavetrain. It provides the energy of a specific length of the wavetrain. See your textbook to determine this length.

The question asks for the total energy in the wave train. This will depend on the overall length of the wavetrain, but this length is not given in the problem statement. Check to make sure that you have provided the complete problem statement.
 
Thank you, TSny, you have clarified the whole thing. The problem statement indicated two cycles and included a diagram showing two cycles; I modified the problem statement because I didn't want to have to reproduce the diagram. I didn't think the number of cycles mattered, and that was my mistake.
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD and TSny
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
777
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K