Total Internal Reflection and Transmitted Wavelength

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the wavelength of a normally polarized wave transmitted through a glass/air interface, focusing on the refractive index and phase continuity. The user has derived the equation λ_t = n_1/n_2 λ_i but is confused about the differences in calculations for the critical angle and an incidence angle of π/3. They express uncertainty about the relevance of Snell's law in this context, despite having calculated the critical angle for the interface. The forum emphasizes the need for users to demonstrate their efforts and follow homework guidelines to receive assistance. Clarity on the application of Snell's law and phase continuity in this scenario is sought for further understanding.
vera1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Find the transmitted wavelength of a normally polarised wave incident at the critical angle at a glass/air interface as a function of n_1, and do the same for an incident angle of pi/3
Relevant Equations
Fresnel's equations and solutions to maxwell's equations in a non-conducting medium
1712407921725.png

In my electrodynamcis assignment I'm being asked to derive the wavelength of the normally polarised wave transmitted through a glass/air interface as a function of ##n_1## (the refractive index of the first medium) using the concept of phase continuity and the fact that maxima should be equal at the interface. I've tried to derive it and keep getting ##\lambda_t = n_1/n_2 \lambda_i##. I've been asked to do this for the critical angle and for an angle of incidence equal to π/3, but I don't see how there can be a difference if Snell's law causes the incident angle to cancel out? I think I'm definitely missing something. We've derived equations for the transmitted, reflected and incident waves in class, as well as Fresnel's equations. To use Snell's law feels a bit below our current level. If it helps, I've calculated the critical angle for the glass/air interface to be 0.729 rad.

Any help would be appreciated, thank you!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K