MHB Total Profit of the business partners for the year

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Business Year
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Three business partners, Q, R, and S, agree to divide their total profit for a certain year in the ratios: 2 : 5 : 8, respectively. If Q's share was 4,000, what was the total profit of the business partners for the year?

My Reasoning:

1. The variables listed represent 3 people.
2. The word ratio means that there are fractions involved.

My problem is making enough sense of the words
to help me set up the proper equation. I know that Q's share is 4000. No share data has been given for R and S.

I decided to let x be the total profit that we need to find. I came up with the equation 2x + 5x + 8x = 4000. If this equation is incorrect, why is it wrong?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
Three business partners, Q, R, and S, agree to divide their total profit for a certain year in the ratios: 2 : 5 : 8, respectively. If Q's share was 4,000, what was the total profit of the business partners for the year?

My Reasoning:

1. The variables listed represent 3 people.
2. The word ratio means that there are fractions involved.

My problem is making enough sense of the words
to help me set up the proper equation. I know that Q's share is 4000. No share data has been given for R and S.

If I let x be the total profit that we need to find. I came up with the equation 2x + 5x + 8x = 4000. If this equation is incorrect, why is it wrong?
Since Q's share = 4000, then 2x = 4000, so x = 2000 : HOKAY?!
 
RTCNTC said:
Three business partners, Q, R, and S, agree to divide their total profit for a certain year in the ratios: 2 : 5 : 8, respectively. If Q's share was 4,000, what was the total profit of the business partners for the year?

My Reasoning:

1. The variables listed represent 3 people.
2. The word ratio means that there are fractions involved.

My problem is making enough sense of the words
to help me set up the proper equation. I know that Q's share is 4000. No share data has been given for R and S.

If I let x be the total profit that we need to find. I came up with the equation 2x + 5x + 8x = 4000. If this equation is incorrect, why is it wrong?
It's not a matter of it being "incorrect", it simply makes no sense because you haven't said what "x" represents! I suspect you are saying since they are in "ratios: 2: 5: 8", thens if Q is 2 times anything, then R is 5 times that "something" and S is 8 times that something. But then "2x+ 5x+ 8x" is to total or Q, R, and S, not just Q itself. You are told that Q= 4000 NOT the total. If Q is 2x and Q is 4000 then 2x= 4000 so x= 2000. Then R= 5(2000) and S= 8(2000)
 
If x = 2000, then R = 5(2000) or 10,000 and S = 8(2000) or 16,000.

I know that Q's share is 4000.

Let TP = total profit

TP = Q + R + S

TP = 4,000 + 10,000 + 16,000

TP = 4,000 + 26,000

TP = 30,000
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top