Totally symmetric tensor

  1. 1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    If t_{ab} are the components of a symmetric tensor and v_a are the components of a vector, show that if:

    [tex] v_{(a}t_{bc)} = 0 [/tex]

    then either the symmetric tensor or the vector = 0.

    Let me know if you are not familiar with the totally symmetric notation.


    2. Relevant equations



    3. The attempt at a solution

    You can write out the 6 terms in the equation above and then reduce it to 3 terms through the symmetry of the tensor but I am not sure where to go from there.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. CompuChip

    CompuChip 4,297
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    I don't really feel like doing that now... can you post what that got you?
     
  4. [tex] v_{a}t_{bc} + v_{c}t_{ab} + v_{b}t_{ca}= 0 [/tex]
     
  5. I think you can do it if you start with the special cases

    [tex] v_{a}t_{aa} = 0 [/tex]

    [tex] 2 v_{a}t_{ab} + v_{b}t_{aa}= 0 [/tex]
     
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2007
  6. I don't know--

    You're first equation only implies that either v_a or t_aa is 0 for a given a. Using the first one with the second one doesn't really imply anything because both v_a and t_aa could be 0 so then there would be no restrictions on t_ab or v_b.
     
  7. v_a is arbitrary, so if v is not identically zero, t_aa must be zero for all a (think of v_1=1, the rest 0, then the same for a=2, 3, ...). Actually, I think that does it, because there's no way t_aa=0 for all a unless t is identically zero.

    Otherwise, for v not identically zero, the second equation then gives v_a t_ab = 0, and, again, since v_a is arbitrary, we must have t_ab = 0.
     
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2007
  8. First of all, v_a is not arbitrary--it is a vector that is part of the problem statement.
    Second, why could you not have something like:

    v_a = (1,0,1,0,1,1,1,0,...)
    t_aa = (0,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,...)

    This is a case where v is not identially zero and t_aa is NOT zero for all a
     
  9. Perhaps it's easier to think of the basis for the vector space as being arbitrary.

    But the equation has to hold for any basis for the vector space, not just this one.
     
    Last edited: Oct 14, 2007
  10. That is not stated in the problem and I think it is not safe to assume that. The problem just gives us the components of a tensor and a vector, presumably in a given basis.

    I think we should be able to prove if it holds in just one basis.
     
  11. Do other people agree with Daverz? I thought when the problem said that "If t_{ab} are the components of a symmetric tensor", that meant it was symmetric in some given basis?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thead via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?