Trajectory in a non inertial frame

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around analyzing the trajectory of an object on a rotating turntable using polar coordinates. The initial equations describe the relationship between radial distance and angular velocity, leading to the conclusion that the motion resembles a spiral. Participants suggest starting from the velocities to derive the polar coordinates in the rotating frame, emphasizing the need to parameterize time for clarity. There is a debate on whether to pursue the velocity approach or stick with the initial method, with caution advised regarding the time-dependent nature of the rotating coordinate system. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the complexities of motion in non-inertial frames and the importance of choosing the right approach for analysis.
LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
The hallmark of an inertial reference frame is that any object which is subject to zero net force will travel in a straight line at constant speed. To illustrate this, consider the following experiment: I am standing on the ground (which we shall take to be an inertial frame) beside a perfectly flat horizontal turntable, rotating with constant angular velocity ω. I lean over and shove a frictionless puck so that it slides across the turntable, straight through the center. The puck is subject to zero net force and, as seen from my inertial frame, travels in a straight line. Describe the puck's path as observed by someone sitting at rest on the turntable. This requires careful thought, but you should be able to get a qualitative picture. For a quantitative picture, it helps to use polar coordinates.
Relevant Equations
r = r*ur
v = r*ur + wru(theta)
Well, make the center of the polar coordinates at the center of the turntable, so put r along the ro initial.
I am well known that to someone who is rest on the turntable, the equations will be the follow:

dr/dt = ro - vt

If the turntable route with angular velocity w,

dtheta/dt = -wt

We could go on with this and finish the question.

But i want to know about the other way that i think to resolve the question starting by the velocities:

We will have v = v = r*ur + wr*u(theta)
v = -v*ur - w(ro-vt)u(theta)

I don't know how should i proceed here..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To make it simpler, you might consider the puck to be released from the centre of the table. If the (polar) coordinates of the puck in the lab frame are ##(r, \theta) = (vt, 0)##, then what are the polar coordinates of the puck in the rotating frame? It might help to draw a quick sketch at some time ##t##.

Once you have time parameterised ##r## and ##\theta##, you can then eliminate ##t##. What sort of shape do you get?
 
etotheipi said:
To make it simpler, you might consider the puck to be released from the centre of the table. If the (polar) coordinates of the puck in the lab frame are ##(r, \theta) = (vt, 0)##, then what are the polar coordinates of the puck in the rotating frame? It might help to draw a quick sketch at some time ##t##.

Once you have time parameterised ##r## and ##\theta##, you can then eliminate ##t##. What sort of shape do you get?
Just to simplify the shape

r = vt
theta = wt

r = v*theta/w

r = K*theta

A type of spiral.

Well, in my question and your example it's easier see the motion by take it directly, but i am confused if i tried to do it starting with the velocity.

Your example:
the minus sign because to someone in rest at the center, he doesn't route, the stone or whatever, that starts a moving this spiral.

v = v*ur ´- wr*utheta
v = v*ur - wvt*utheta

Make sense i try to integrate this? I think not, maybe is this a dead end and have to do the first approach?
 
1589276193387.png
 
You can try a velocity approach as well. It's perhaps easiest in Cartesian coordinates. In the lab frame, the velocity might be ##\vec{v} = v \hat{x}##, or more succinctly ##v_x = v##.

You might then try and find what the components of velocity ##v_x'## and ##v_y'## are in a rotating frame (with rotating ##x'## and ##y'## axes.

But be careful: the ##\hat{x}'## and ##\hat{y}'## basis vectors are also functions of time...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes LCSphysicist
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K