Transcendental Values for sin(Q*pi)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter marschmellow
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of whether the value of sin(Q*pi) can be transcendental when Q is a rational number. Participants explore mathematical properties and implications of sine values derived from rational arguments, considering various approaches and formulas.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if sin(Q*pi) can yield transcendental values for rational Q.
  • Another suggests using multiple angle formulas or complex exponentials to analyze the problem.
  • A participant notes that for integer values of Q, sin(Q*pi) equals zero, which may limit the discussion.
  • One participant presents a polynomial relationship involving sin(Q*pi) and cos(Q*pi), arguing that it leads to a polynomial with integer coefficients, implying that the sine value cannot be transcendental.
  • Another participant expresses difficulty in following the technical explanation but is more interested in the conclusion than the details.
  • A suggestion is made to recall the definition of "transcendental" and to derive formulas for sin(2x) and sin(3x) as part of the reasoning process.
  • One participant provides a detailed argument showing that sin(πa/b) can be expressed in terms of algebraic numbers, concluding that such sine values are not transcendental.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that sin(Q*pi) for rational Q does not yield transcendental values, as multiple arguments support this conclusion through polynomial relationships. However, the discussion includes varying levels of understanding and acceptance of the technical details presented.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty regarding the technical explanations, and there is a reliance on specific mathematical definitions and properties that may not be universally understood. The discussion does not resolve all nuances related to the definitions of transcendental numbers.

marschmellow
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Simple question that for some reason I can't reason myself through. I'm probably going to be mad at myself when someone provides me with the insight needed to solve this and I didn't find it on my own, but anyway, here goes:

If sin(Q*pi)=A, where Q is rational, can any values of A be transcendental?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Multiple angle formula. Or complex exponential, I suppose.
 
Thanks for the help, but that only covers integer values of Q, I think. If Q is restricted to integers then sin(Q*pi)=0.
 
if [itex]\sin{Q \pi} = x[/itex], where Q is rational, by the virtue of the multiple angle formula, there is a polynomial P(x,y) with integer coefficients such that [itex]P(\sin{Q \pi}, \cos{Q \pi}) = P(x, \sqrt{1-x^2}) = 0[/itex].

Furthermore, [itex]P(x, \sqrt{1-x^2}) = R(x) + S(x) \sqrt{1-x^2}[/itex] for some integer polynomials R and S.

Therefore there is an integer polynomial [itex]R(x)^2 - S(x)^2(1-x^2) = 0[/itex] that has x as its root.

Therefore x is not transcendental.
 
I can't say I completely followed that, but I believe you, and I'm honestly more interested in the answer than an explanation, however weird that is for math questions.
 
Do you remember the definition of "transcendental"? Can you write down formulas for sin(2x) and sin(3x) and take it from there?
 
Let [itex]A = \sin(\pi a/b)[/itex], where [itex]a,b[/itex] are integers. Then [itex]p(A) = \sin(\pi a) = 0[/itex] for some polynomial [itex]p[/itex] with rational coefficients, by using an appropriate multiple angle formula. Since [itex]A[/itex] is the root of a polynomial with rational coefficients, it is not transcendental.edit: I've spent some time thinking about it (read: sleep), and have come up with a nicer solution. Observe that [itex]A = \sin(\pi a/b) = (x + \bar x)/2i[/itex], where [itex]x = e^{i\pi a/b}[/itex]. Now [itex]x^{2b} - 1 = 0[/itex], proving that [itex]x[/itex] is algebraic, and thus so is [itex]A[/itex].
 
Last edited:
adriank said:
Let [itex]A = \sin(\pi a/b)[/itex], where [itex]a,b[/itex] are integers. Then [itex]p(A) = \sin(\pi a) = 0[/itex] for some polynomial [itex]p[/itex] with rational coefficients, by using an appropriate multiple angle formula. Since [itex]A[/itex] is the root of a polynomial with rational coefficients, it is not transcendental.edit: I've spent some time thinking about it (read: sleep), and have come up with a nicer solution. Observe that [itex]A = \sin(\pi a/b) = (x + \bar x)/2i[/itex], where [itex]x = e^{i\pi a/b}[/itex]. Now [itex]x^{2b} - 1 = 0[/itex], proving that [itex]x[/itex] is algebraic, and thus so is [itex]A[/itex].
Wow, thanks a lot. That explanation makes sense, but I couldn't have thought of it on my own, so I'm glad I have no regrets for asking for help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 85 ·
3
Replies
85
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K