Transformation matrix on tensors

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on transforming a rank 2 tensor represented as a diagonal matrix R in one coordinate system [x1, x2, x3] to another orthogonal coordinate system [X1, X2, X3] using a transformation matrix U. The correct operation for transforming the tensor is established as R(in Xi) = U^-1 R(in xi) U, which involves the inverse of the transformation matrix and matrix multiplication. The rationale behind this transformation is rooted in the multilinear map representation of tensors and the application of linear maps to account for changes in coordinate systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rank 2 tensors and their matrix representation
  • Familiarity with orthogonal coordinate systems
  • Knowledge of transformation matrices and their inverses
  • Basic principles of multilinear algebra and linear maps
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of transformation matrices in tensor calculus
  • Learn about multilinear maps and their applications in physics
  • Explore the derivation and implications of the tensor transformation law
  • Investigate practical examples of tensor transformations in engineering applications
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and engineers involved in tensor analysis, particularly those working with coordinate transformations in mechanics and relativity.

kernelinho
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello.

I wasn't sure whether to post this here on in some of the physics sections.

I have a rank 2 tensor in one coordinate reference system [x1, x2, x3], the one where only the principal elements are non zero: R=[ a11 0 0; 0 a22 0; 0 0 a33 ].

I want the tensor R in some other orthogonal coordinate reference system. I have the transformation matrix U from the system [x1, x2, x3] to the second one [X1, X2, X3].

I know how to use U to transform vectors from one system to the other:

[V1; V2; V3]= U [v1; v2; v3]

But I don't know what operation to do to transform a tensor. I'm led to believe that it could be something like

[R(in Xi)] = U^-1 R(in xi) U

But I'm not sure whether this is right nor what's the rationale for it.

I would appreciate any help you could give me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Same thing. Think of the tensor and transformation as matrices and multiply the matrices.
 
In addition, even if the tensor was not representable as a matrix (two dimensional rectangular array of numbers), you still have the functional representation, T(v) is a multilinear map from some space V to some space W, and you have linear maps C and C' from V to V' and W to W' respectively, where V' and W' are identical to V and W except for the coordinate maps for their elements. Then C'(T(C-1v)) is T with the coordinate change applied, as T can only act on objects in V and transforms them to W objects. The C's take care of translating the objects from V' and into W', where if v is a multivector, the linear transformations are distributed appropriately. By linearity, we have C'TC-1 as the proper tensor, as you have already surmised.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K