Transforming a Wedge into an Angular Sector

  • Thread starter Thread starter T-O7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angular Wedge
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the transformation of a circular wedge into an angular sector using the mapping z_{1}=\frac{z-a}{z-b}, which is a Möbius transformation. This transformation maps the endpoints a and b such that a approaches 0 and b approaches infinity, resulting in the boundary curves of the wedge becoming straight lines while preserving angles. The second transformation, w = z_{1}^\alpha, further maps the angular sector onto a half-plane by widening the angle through the power α. Participants clarify that Möbius transformations map circles to circles or straight lines, ensuring that the boundary curves of the wedge are straight lines. The conversation concludes with an affirmation of understanding regarding the nature of these transformations in the context of the Riemann Sphere.
T-O7
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Okay,
I'm having trouble understanding the following:
Given a region of a circular wedge with endpoints a and b, the mapping z_{1}=\frac{z-a}{z-b} transforms this wedge into an angular sector. Then, by an appropriate power \alpha, the map w = z_{1}^\alpha maps the angular sector onto a half plane. How exactly does this wedge turn into a nice angular sector just by z_1? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Im not sure what your region is, an image could help...

The frist transformation is making a go to 0 and b go to \infty. That means that all arcs passing trough b will be straight lines. Given that it is conformal (is a Möbius transform), preserves angles. So the anlge in which the two curves cut will preserve, and if the other curve passes trough a and b, there you have the angular sector.

The sedcond one is easy to see, remember that a complex variable can be written in the form z=Re^{i\theta}. Consequently
z^{\alpha}=R^{\alpha}e^{i\alpha\theta}

The angle has been widen by \alpha.

Sorry for bad english
 
Last edited:
Hmm...okay. I think I understand the second map now. For the first one though, I'm still a little unclear about why the two "boundary" curves (say \gamma_1 and \gamma_2) of the circular wedge that connect a and b are mapped to straight lines. How do we know they don't get mapped onto non-straight lines? I understand that they must preserve the angle between each other at the image of a and at b (i.e at 0 and \infty), but why straight lines? And how do you 'interpret' the angle preserving behaviour of \gamma_1 and \gamma_2 at the image of b(i.e at \infty)?
 
Okay, so i think i may have somewhat understood what you were saying before, ReyChiquito. If the map z_1 is a Mobius transformation, then it must map circles to circles (considering lines as circles too). Since the edge curves \gamma_1 and \gamma_2 of the circular wedge is part of a circle, their images under z_1 must also be circles (or lines). But it can't be a real circle, otherwise it wouldn't map b to \infty, so it must be a straight line.

Is this half-logical thinking? :redface:
 
That would be correct. Think of the transformation in the Riemann Sphere. What does a circle that passes trough N looks like in the C-plane?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K