Transforming Fields in Inertial and Rotating Frames

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cragar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fall Free fall Orbit
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of inertial reference frames, particularly in the context of orbiting bodies and rotating frames. Participants explore the implications of being in a free-fall state around Earth and how this relates to both Newtonian mechanics and General Relativity, as well as the transformation of electric and magnetic fields in different frames of reference.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that being in orbit around Earth constitutes a constant free-fall, questioning if this qualifies as an inertial reference frame.
  • Another participant counters that an inertial reference frame is defined as one without acceleration, indicating that the centripetal acceleration in orbit disqualifies it as inertial.
  • A third participant notes that in the Newtonian framework, a freely falling frame is not inertial due to its acceleration relative to a fixed inertial frame, while in General Relativity, it is locally inertial.
  • Some participants suggest that one can apply special relativity in a locally inertial frame, particularly in the context of General Relativity.
  • A participant introduces a scenario involving a charged spherical shell rotating with them in orbit, questioning the behavior of electric and magnetic fields in this setup.
  • Another participant explains that even in a rotating frame, non-zero magnetic fields can arise due to fictitious currents, emphasizing the complexity of transforming fields between inertial and non-inertial frames.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether an orbiting frame is inertial, with some arguing it is locally inertial in General Relativity while others maintain it is not inertial in the Newtonian sense. The discussion on field transformations also highlights a lack of consensus on the implications of rotating frames.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about the definitions of inertial frames and the conditions under which special relativity can be applied. There are unresolved details regarding the transformation of electric and magnetic fields in non-inertial frames.

cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3
If I am in orbit around Earth that means that I am in constant free-fall around earth.
Is this an inertial reference frame?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I do not believe you are. An inertial reference frame is one in which there is no acceleration. Here you have a centripetal acceleration due to gravity.
 
In the Newtonian framework no, a freely falling frame is not inertial because it is accelerating with respect to some fixed background inertial frame. In the GR framework, a freely falling frame is locally inertial.
 
so it would be considered inertial, then I could use special relativity in that frame
 
In Newtonian mechanics it is not an inertial frame (however you can still do Newtonian mechanics in this frame as long as you transform to the frame correctly). In GR, it is locally an inertial frame and locally you can do SR.
 
cragar said:
so it would be considered inertial, then I could use special relativity in that frame
Locally, yes.
 
ok here is a question I have had for a while related to that. Let's say there is a charged spherical shell around me and the earth, and I am orbiting the earth, and the charged spherical shell is rotating with me at a constant
\omega so relative to me the charged spherical shell is not moving and the shell is just slightly at a larger radius than me. But to someone standing on Earth the shell is rotating, and in their frame this will produce a B field that points up and is constant. what's going on.
 
Actually even when you are in the frame of an observer rotating exactly with the (slowly) rotating shell of charge, there will be a non-zero magnetic field observed in the rotating frame due to fictitious currents. You have to be careful about how ##E## and ##B## fields transform from inertial frames to rotating frames, which are non-inertial. It is not as simple as transforming the fields from one inertial frame to another. For a detailed calculation of the scenario you described, see here: http://www.hep.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/examples/rotatingshell.pdf
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K