Transition from pressurised envoronment to vaccum environment

  • Thread starter Thread starter armin11
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transition
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the challenges of transitioning from a pressurized environment to a vacuum without air loss, primarily focusing on the limitations of current airlock technology. Participants explore the feasibility of alternative mechanisms, such as a "plasma window" and innovative materials that could allow human passage while preventing air leakage. However, the consensus is that existing technology necessitates the use of airlocks, which inherently lose a small percentage of air during operation. Suggestions for improving airlock efficiency include designing collapsible airlocks and exploring the "suitport" concept for astronaut mobility.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of airlock mechanisms and their operation in spacecraft.
  • Familiarity with plasma technology and its applications in vacuum environments.
  • Knowledge of materials science, particularly regarding membranes and their properties.
  • Basic principles of astronautical engineering and space suit design.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "plasma window" technology and its potential applications in aerospace engineering.
  • Investigate advancements in materials that can act as air-tight seals while allowing human passage.
  • Explore the "suitport" concept and its implications for future space missions.
  • Study engineering solutions for enhancing airlock efficiency and minimizing air loss during transitions.
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, materials scientists, and professionals involved in space mission design and astronaut safety will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focused on improving airlock technology and reducing air loss in spacecraft environments.

armin11
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I wanted to know who has an idea about a mechanism to transit from pressurised environment to vacuum environemtn without losing air.I know airlock does this work but it has some air loss.does anybody have idea?
I thought about some kind of bulb to be produced at the transition place,is it possible?is there any kind of material to do this?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
material like soap bulb but stiffer that cannot transit matter

hi,
is there some kind of material that is not able to transit air molecules but is able to transit humans through it?something like soap bulb but stiffer that can recover itself if a perturbation occurs in it?
 


There is no such thing available, what you're proposing would be something akin to a force field. You're going to have to use an airlock, there's basically no way around it.
 
There's no way to do this wihout an airlock. You can pump down an airlock, I'm not sure its a given that you lose air through it...
 
But I think we can replace airlock,airlock loses some air each time it opens,though it is about 2 or 3 percent but it is considerable in a spacecraft ...
 
What you're proposing is impossible given current technology- you would need an air-tight seal around whatever passes through the "membrane" (an impossible feat with something like a space suit which is covered on the exterior with fabric) and it would also have to capable of maintaining a non-leaking vacuum seal (also no small task).
 
Impossible is impossible!
The material can be like ambrio around baby when it is born!
 
:zzz:

Got any material suggestions that act as a porous membrane to a man in a space suit but not air molecules?
 


armin11 said:
Hi,
I wanted to know who has an idea about a mechanism to transit from pressurised environment to vacuum environemtn without losing air.I know airlock does this work but it has some air loss.does anybody have idea?
I thought about some kind of bulb to be produced at the transition place,is it possible?is there any kind of material to do this?

armin11 said:
hi,
is there some kind of material that is not able to transit air molecules but is able to transit humans through it?something like soap bulb but stiffer that can recover itself if a perturbation occurs in it?

Two threads merged.

arimin11 -- in the future, do not multiple post your question across multiple PF forums.
 
  • #11
Thanks cmb, interesting topic!
 
  • #12
So you're suggesting the astronaut should pass through a plasma arc?
 
  • #13
Not exactly pass through plasma arc,but there can be a basic research based on the facts about plasma window,I think it is better than nothing! You see a problem here or have another opinion?
 
  • #14
My opinion is the same- you need an air lock...
 
  • #15
I'm not sure about the effects of plasma on the astronaut's health and his systems.
How about using force fields or force shields?Any opinions?
 
  • #16
Where are you getting this notion that that sort of technology exists or even is anywhere near usable?
 
  • #17
I don't say it is usable now,but someday it'll be usable and the technology will be developed.So any idea now what the technology will be?
 
  • #18
Let's not bicker people.

Force fields are pure science fiction. The membrane idea is interesting but essentially it's just a fancy airlock, albiet one that uses endocytosis. How about rather than focussing on highly/overly speculative ideas (some of which have no basis in reality) you focus on the engineering problems of airlocks to make them more efficient?
 
  • #19
You mean like recapturing some of the lost air?I've thought about it.My idea is that we transfer high voltage electricity to the air exiting airlock to make it ionized then with the help of a magnetic filed inside the airlock we can collect these air molecules that have gone out of airlock.But there are some flaws to this concept,like high voltage in a room full of oxygen is disaster or these ionized air molecules could harm astronaut's charged systems. Any idea to do this air recapturing ?
 
  • #20
I like this questions. Innovative idea. However, passing through a substance might be possible. But not in a standard suit. As the astronaut is halfway through he will experience air pressure on one side and vacuum on the other. Given that his cross-section will be about 1m^2 that's 10 tonnes. It would put him under a bit of pressure. Suits are designed to take the pressure from the inside not the outside.

To prevent this problem he would have to have a special suit to go through or the substance would have to be very thick. Eitherway we are getting back to an airlock. If you really wanted to prevent air leakage it would be easier to design the airlock to collapse to prevent leakage. So the airlock is made of soft material that surrounds the astronaut when he enters and pushes all the air out. Then the air lock opens and no air is lost.
 
  • #21
Thanks MikeBH, nice point about the material.I was googling some ideas and I found a technology called suitport. It is in a way that spacesuits are outside the spacecraft and when astronaut wants to don them he goes directly from a room into his suit and drifts away from spacecraft . This concept has some flaws,as the pressure between suit and room are different and what could possibly be the technology for returning to spacecraft . returning must be something like airplane landing,it should be precise and controlled.What you guys think of this idea and how can be the returning system? can he use some sort of electromagnetic things that when astronaut is close enough these systems are activated and park the astronaut autonomously in his place?
 
  • #22
Thought this thread might be interested in this - what happens to a body in a vacuum?
That empty feeling, when everything sucks! http://wp.me/p2lfqY-11
 
  • #23
How can we design a suit that can be donned and doffed symmetrically?I think if the suit is like coffin this criteria will be met!
 
  • #24
Use a vacuum pump on the spacecraft to evacuate the air in the airlock back into the craft before opening the doors. Simple engineering solution.
 
  • #25
They do that on airlocks,they pump the remaining air of airlock and vacuum it,but there is still some air loss.How could that little amount be zeroed,that is the problem.
 
  • #26
armin11 said:
Thanks MikeBH, nice point about the material.I was googling some ideas and I found a technology called suitport. It is in a way that spacesuits are outside the spacecraft and when astronaut wants to don them he goes directly from a room into his suit and drifts away from spacecraft . This concept has some flaws,as the pressure between suit and room are different and what could possibly be the technology for returning to spacecraft . returning must be something like airplane landing,it should be precise and controlled.What you guys think of this idea and how can be the returning system? can he use some sort of electromagnetic things that when astronaut is close enough these systems are activated and park the astronaut autonomously in his place?
I'm not sure what you mean by returning, I don't see why it would be that much different to finding the airlock. Essentially the design is that a suit is attached to the outer hull with the back of the suit opening up directly into the ship. All an astronaut does is climb into the suit, press a button to close the back of it (presumably another tight fitting hatch closes on the inside to prevent a hole) and disconnects: see this picture for a demo. It could be made so that where the suit is stored there are protruding hand holds so that when an astronaut gets back he holds on and slots himself in place.
 
  • #27
By Returning I mean that when astronaut does his/her job and wants to get back to airlock. i think it is better if astronaut gets close enough to a distance to the craft and then an autonomous system catches him and attaches him to the craft.In the suitport, donning and doffing are not symmetrical, I mean doffing the suit isn't as easy as donning it. I'm trying to come up with an idea for a suit that it can be donned and doffed easily.Any ideas?
 
  • #28
The amount of oxygen the astronaut is taking with him to breathe is much more than the losses in the airlock. The energy needed to nigh-fully pump down the airlock is probably more detrimental than the slight air loss.
 
  • #29
armin11 said:
By Returning I mean that when astronaut does his/her job and wants to get back to airlock. i think it is better if astronaut gets close enough to a distance to the craft and then an autonomous system catches him and attaches him to the craft.In the suitport, donning and doffing are not symmetrical, I mean doffing the suit isn't as easy as donning it. I'm trying to come up with an idea for a suit that it can be donned and doffed easily.Any ideas?
I still don't understand why an automated system is needed. Astronauts have managed for decades to get out of and into their vehicles, why would a suitport system be any more complicated.

Regarding getting in and out it is hardly any more complicated than a Russian Orlan suit and IIRC those allowed a cosmonaut to go from inside to full EVA in a matter of minutes compared to the NASA suits that took hours.
 
  • #30
@Travis: So we try to come up with an idea to both lower the power and cost needed and lower the air loss!
@Ryan: Don't you think it'll be good if an autonomous system catches them?! We had some cases where astronaut couldn't find the airlock door or couldn't ingress the airlock!
So let's think about improving EVA from the way it is!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
849
Replies
95
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K