Transitional Equilibrium: Tension Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the tension in three ropes supporting a box with a weight of 200 Newtons. The context is within the subject area of static equilibrium and vector resolution in physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to set up equations based on the sum of forces in the x and y directions, expressing tensions in terms of each other. Some participants question the accuracy of the angles used in the equations and suggest checking the signs of the tensions.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the setup of the equations and the values obtained for the tensions. There is a recognition of potential errors in the original poster's calculations, particularly regarding the use of trigonometric functions and the signs of the tensions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to check the angles and the relationships between the tensions.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses uncertainty about the correctness of their calculated values for T1 and T2, noting discrepancies when substituting back into the equations. There is an indication of possible rounding errors or misapplication of values in their checks.

CLeSure
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A box with a weight of 200 Newtons is hung from ropes as shown below. Calculate the tension in each of the three ropes supporting the box.

tension.jpg



Homework Equations



\SigmaF_{x}=0
\SigmaF_{y}=0

The Attempt at a Solution



We know right from the start that the tension of T3 is going to be 200N.

To begin solving for the tensions of T1 and T2, I started by setting up X and Y component equations:

\SigmaF_{x}= -T1cos(30) + T2cos(50) + 200cos(270) = 0
\SigmaF_{y}= T1sin(150) + T2sin(50) + 200sin(270) = 0

Looking at the X component equation, I figured it would be easiest to solve for T2 in terms of T1, my result being:

T2 = T1cos(30) / cos(50)

I substituted the value of T2 into the component Y equation, and solved for T1:

\SigmaF_{y}= T1sin(150) + [T1cos(30) / cos(50)]*sin(50) + 200sin(270) = 0

I then took my value for T1 and applied it to the original X component equation, and solved for T2.

My problem is the solved values I get for T1 and T2 don't end up adding to equal 0 when in either equation. I realize I must have made an error in my equations, most likely in the trig functions. Any help on identifying where my logic in setting up the equations went wrong would be much appreciated.

Thanks,

Chris
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Draw a vector to define 0deg, and check your angles.

T1, T2, and T3 should be the same sign in both sums.

Regards,

Bill
 
CLeSure said:
My problem is the solved values I get for T1 and T2 don't end up adding to equal 0 when in either equation. I realize I must have made an error in my equations, most likely in the trig functions. Any help on identifying where my logic in setting up the equations went wrong would be much appreciated.

What values did you get?
 
lowlypion said:
what values did you get?

t1 = 130.541
t2 = 175.877
 
CLeSure said:
t1 = 130.541
t2 = 175.877

That's pretty much what I get.

And I'd say that's correct.

All I can think is that you have reversed T1 and T2 in plugging them back into check them. Because if those are the equations that spawned the answers, you should expect that they will calculate back to equal 0, since that's what the components are supposed to add to. If your differences are small then it's likely just rounding errors. If they are large, then it must be putting the wrong values with the wrong angles.
 
LowlyPion said:
That's pretty much what I get.

And I'd say that's correct.

All I can think is that you have reversed T1 and T2 in plugging them back into check them. Because if those are the equations that spawned the answers, you should expect that they will calculate back to equal 0, since that's what the components are supposed to add to. If your differences are small then it's likely just rounding errors. If they are large, then it must be putting the wrong values with the wrong angles.

Thanks for taking the time to help. I rechecked my answers by putting them back into the X-component equation and they equal out to zero. I must have messed up when I was checking my answers before. Thanks!

Chris
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K