Translation Invariance of Outer Measure .... Axler, Result 2.7 ....

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the proof of Result 2.7 from Sheldon Axler's book "Measure, Integration & Real Analysis," specifically regarding the translation invariance of outer measure. The key assertion is that for a non-empty set A in ℝ and a real number t, the inequality |t + A| ≤ |A| holds when taking the infimum over sequences of open intervals I_k that cover A. This conclusion is supported by the lemma stating that if b is less than or equal to all elements in A, then b is less than or equal to the infimum of A.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of outer measure concepts in real analysis
  • Familiarity with the definitions of infimum and supremum
  • Knowledge of open intervals and their properties in ℝ
  • Basic grasp of measure theory as presented in Axler's "Measure, Integration & Real Analysis"
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of outer measure in detail, focusing on translation invariance
  • Review the properties of infimum and supremum in the context of real analysis
  • Examine additional results and lemmas in Axler's book related to measure theory
  • Explore examples of open interval coverings and their implications for measure
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of real analysis, and anyone studying measure theory, particularly those focused on the properties of outer measures and their applications in mathematical proofs.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
TL;DR
I need help in order to fully understand Axler's proof of the translation invariance of outer measure ...
I am reading Sheldon Axler's book: Measure, Integration & Real Analysis ... and I am focused on Chapter 2: Measures ...

I need help with the proof of Result 2.7 ...

Result 2.7 and its proof read as follows:
Axler - Result  2.7 - outer measure is translation invariant .png


In the above proof by Axler we read the following:

" ... ... Thus

... ##\mid t + A \mid \leq \sum_{ k = 1 }^{ \infty } l ( t + I_k ) = \sum_{ k = 1 }^{ \infty } l ( I_k )##

Taking the infimum of the last term over all sequences ##I_1, I_2, ... ## of open intervals whose union contains ##A##, we have ##\mid t + A \mid \leq \mid A \mid##. ... ..."Can someone please explain exactly how/why taking the infimum of the last term over all sequences ##I_1, I_2, ... ## of open intervals whose union contains ##A##, we have ##\mid t + A \mid \leq \mid A \mid## ... ?...Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use a similar lemma as in your previous questions:

If ##A## is a non-emptyset of ##\Bbb{R}## and ##b## is a real number with ##b\leq a## for all ##a\in A##, then ##b\leq \inf(A)##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur and Math Amateur
Thanks Math_QED ...
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K