Triangle inequaility for sets of same cardinality

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the triangle inequality for sets of the same cardinality, specifically for subsets A_x, A_y, and A_z of a set Ω, where |A_x| = |A_y| = |A_z| = k. The proof employs reductio ad absurdum, demonstrating that the inequality |A_x - A_z| ≤ |A_x - A_y| + |A_y - A_z| holds true. By utilizing the inclusion-exclusion principle, the proof reveals that the assumption of the inequality being false leads to a contradiction, confirming the validity of the statement without reliance on the cardinality condition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of set theory and cardinality
  • Familiarity with the inclusion-exclusion principle
  • Knowledge of reductio ad absurdum proof technique
  • Basic concepts of subsets and set operations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the inclusion-exclusion principle in depth
  • Explore advanced topics in set theory, focusing on cardinality
  • Learn about different proof techniques, including indirect proofs
  • Investigate applications of triangle inequalities in various mathematical contexts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of mathematics, and anyone interested in set theory and its applications, particularly in proving inequalities involving sets of equal cardinality.

mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hello,
given a set [tex]\Omega[/tex], we consider all its subsets [itex]A_1,A_2,A_3,\ldots[/itex] with same cardinality k.

Do you have some hint in order to prove the following:

[tex]\forall A_x,A_y,A_z\subseteq \Omega[/tex] such that [tex]|A_x|=|A_y|=|A_z|=k[/tex]

[tex]|A_x-A_z| \leq |A_x-A_y|+ |A_y-A_z|[/tex]

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe I solved it by myself.
For the sake of brevity I'll write [itex]X=A_x[/itex], [itex]Y=A_y[/itex], [itex]Z=A_z[/itex].

By reductio-ad-absurdum let's assume that:

[tex]|X-Z|>|X-Y|+|Y-Z|[/tex]

re-writing it in different form, we have that:

[tex]|X|-|X \cap Z| > |X|+|Y|-|X \cap Y|-|Y\cap Z|[/tex]

Now, recalling the inclusion-exclusion formula for three sets X,Y,Z, we can write:

[tex]|X|-|X \cap Z| > |X\cup\ Y\cup Z| - |Z| + |X\cap Z| - |X\cap Y\cap Z|[/tex]

Simply re-arranging the terms, and using the inclusion-exclusion formula for the leftmost term yields:

[tex]|X \cup Z| + |X\cap Y\cap Z| > |X\cup\ Y\cup Z| + |X\cap Z|[/tex]

Now, it is easy to observe that [itex]|X \cup Z| \leq |X\cup\ Y\cup Z|[/itex] and [itex]|X \cap Y\cap Z| \leq |X\cap\ Z|[/itex], so the leftmost term is always less than or equal to the rightmost term: we reached a contradiction with the initial hypothesis and the statement is proved.

--Interestingly we have not used the fact that |X|=|Y|=|Z|, so apparently the statement holds in general.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K