MHB Trig problem: max square cut from circle

bmanmcfly
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED]Trig problem: max square cut from circle

View attachment 726
Since this one is homework related, ill ask this as a procession so that I can make sure that I am grasping the logic.

the question is that with a round log with a diameter of 16cm, what is the strongest log that can be cut where the strength = width * depth^2.

So, I figured the biggest square would use the diameter. I have to use trig functions, so, I have the d as [math]d= \sqrt{(16\sin(x))}[/math]. Then I put [math]w=16\cos(x)[/math]

because d is squared relative to w.

does the logic of this make sense so far? (Like the pic)
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    18.1 KB · Views: 102
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you studied Lagrange multipliers?
 
MarkFL said:
Have you studied Lagrange multipliers?

I don't think so?
 
Okay, I just wanted to be sure before suggesting that method, as it would be simpler computationally, however, it can still be done. I would approach this problem not in a trigonometric manner, but rather using a coordinate geometry approach.

I would orient my coordinate axes such that the center of the circular cross section of the log is at the origin, and so the perimeter of the cross section is a circle with radius 8 (let all linear measures be in cm) centered at the origin. How can we express the perimeter?

Next, I would let the upper right vertex of the rectangular beam to be cut from the log, be at the point $(x,y)$ in the first quadrant.

Can you now express the width and height of the rectangular cross section, and using the perimeter of the log, then express the strength function in one variable?
 
MarkFL said:
Okay, I just wanted to be sure before suggesting that method, as it would be simpler computationally, however, it can still be done. I would approach this problem not in a trigonometric manner, but rather using a coordinate geometry approach.

I would orient my coordinate axes such that the center of the circular cross section of the log is at the origin, and so the perimeter of the cross section is a circle with radius 8 (let all linear measures be in cm) centered at the origin. How can we express the perimeter?

Next, I would let the upper right vertex of the rectangular beam to be cut from the log, be at the point $(x,y)$ in the first quadrant.

Can you now express the width and height of the rectangular cross section, and using the perimeter of the log, then express the strength function in one variable?
While I see how you are approaching this, I must use a trigonometric functions to find the dimensions.

Id be much happier not using trig functions myself. Especially that you don't have an angle and only 1 side is known.

So, what I have ATM is [math]s=16\cos(x)•(16\sin(x))^2[/math]

From there, I figure I need to find a max value, so I'll find the derivative of s, [math]\frac{ds}{dx}=-\sin^3(x)+8192\cos^2(x)\sin(x)[/math]

How does this sound sofar
 
Your strength function looks good, but your differentiation looks incorrect. I would write:

$$s(x)=4096\sin^2(x)\cos(x)$$

Now, just carry the constant, and differentiate the product of the two trig functions. what do you find?
 
MarkFL said:
Your strength function looks good, but your differentiation looks incorrect. I would write:

$$s(x)=4096\sin^2(x)\cos(x)$$

Now, just carry the constant, and differentiate the product of the two trig functions. what do you find?
Thanks, would it still be equivalent to simplify 2cosx•sinx giving
[math]s(x)=2048\sin(2x)\sin(x)[/math]
??
 
Yes, you could do that, as you have correctly applied the double-angle identity for sine. (Yes)
 
MarkFL said:
Yes, you could do that, as you have correctly applied the double-angle identity for sine. (Yes)

Ok, so, I wound up with
[math] \frac{ds}{dx}=4096\cos(2x)\sin(x)+2048\sin(2x)\cos(x)[/math]

Which I plugged into the graphing calc to get a 0at 0.95532.

So, I suppose I should ask here if I could be directed to a simple method to sketch a complex trig equation like this? Better that I remember a method to do this when it comes to test time...

Edit:Ok, sweet, I was handling this correctly, and when I used x at the first 0, it gave me the correct answers that I needed.

The question does remain, is it really just a matter of remembering the y range ?
Thanks for the help...
 
Last edited:
  • #10
I would write:

$$s'(x)=2048(\sin(2x)\cos(x)+2\cos(2x)\sin(x))=4096 \sin(x)(\cos^2(x)+2\cos^2(x)-1)=$$

$$4096\sin(x)(3\cos^2(x)-1)=0$$

We know we want $$0<x<\frac{\pi}{2}$$ hence the critical values comes from:

$$x=\cos^{-1}\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} \right)\approx0.9553166181245092$$

How can we demonstrate using the calculus, that this critical value is at a maximum for the strength function?
 
  • #11
MarkFL said:
I would write:

$$s'(x)=2048(\sin(2x)\cos(x)+2\cos(2x)\sin(x))=
4096 \sin(x)(\cos^2(x)+2\cos^2(x)-1)=$$

$$4096\sin(x)(3\cos^2(x)-1)=0$$

We know we want $$0<x<\frac{\pi}{2}$$ hence the critical values comes from:

$$x=\cos^{-1}\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} \right)\approx0.9553166181245092$$

How can we demonstrate using the calculus, that this critical value is at a maximum for the strength function?

$$4096\sin(x)(3\cos^2(x)-1)=0$$

Is it wrong to just divide the $$4096\sin(x)$$ out, since it would be dividing under a 0? It seems valid, but feels too easy.

To your question, in this case the assumption could be made that the first critical point was a max, but otherwise running the second derivative would show if the curve was up or down. Going down would prove it was a max.
 
  • #12
Yes, you may divide through by that factor since it yields no roots for $x$ in the desired interval.

Also, you are right; the second derivative test is a valid means of determining the nature of the extremum. If the second derivative of the strength function is negative at the critical value, then you know it is concave down there, and so the extremum must then be a maximum.
 
Back
Top