MHB Trigonometric equality sin15°sin24°sin57°=sin39°sin27°sin18°

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trigonometric
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Prove $\sin 15^\circ \sin 24^\circ \sin 57^\circ= \sin 39^\circ \sin 27^\circ \sin 18^\circ$.
This is an unsolved problem I found @ AOPS.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Prove $\sin 15^\circ \sin 24^\circ \sin 57^\circ= \sin 39^\circ \sin 27^\circ \sin 18^\circ$.
[sp]Using the sum-and-product trig formulas, $$\begin{aligned}\sin 15^\circ \sin 24^\circ \sin 57^\circ &= \sin 15^\circ\cdot\tfrac12\bigl( \cos 33^\circ - \cos 81^\circ\bigr) \\ &= \tfrac14\bigl( \sin 48^\circ - \sin 18^\circ - \sin 96^\circ + \sin 66^\circ\bigr),\qquad(1) \\ \\ \sin 39^\circ \sin 27^\circ \sin 18^\circ &= \sin 39^\circ\cdot\tfrac12\bigl( \cos 9^\circ - \cos 45^\circ\bigr) \\ &= \tfrac14\bigl( \sin 48^\circ + \sin 30^\circ - \sin 84^\circ + \sin 6^\circ\bigr). \qquad(2)\end{aligned}$$

Comparing (1) and (2), they both contain $\sin 48^\circ$. Also, $\sin 96^\circ = \sin 84^\circ$ (because the sine function is symmetric on either side of $90^\circ$). So to show that (1) and (2) are equal, we need to prove that $\sin 66^\circ - \sin 18^\circ - \sin 6^\circ = \sin 30^\circ = \frac12.$ But $$\sin 66^\circ - \sin 6^\circ = 2\cos 36^\circ \sin 30^\circ = \cos 36^\circ = \sin 54^\circ.$$

Therefore it remains to show that $\sin 54^\circ - \sin 18^\circ = \frac12.$ The nicest way to do that is to use the geometry of the pentagon.
[TIKZ]
\coordinate [label=above: $C$] (C) at (90:5cm) ;
\coordinate [label=above right: $D$] (D) at (18:5cm) ;
\coordinate [label=above left: $B$] (B) at (162:5cm) ;
\coordinate [label=below: $A$] (A) at (234:5cm) ;
\coordinate [label=below: $E$] (E) at (306:5cm) ;
\coordinate [label=below: $P$] (P) at (-4.755,-4.045) ;
\coordinate [label=below: $Q$] (Q) at (4.755,-4.045) ;
\draw (A) -- node
{$1$} (B) -- node[above left] {$1$} (C) -- node[above right] {$1$} (D) -- node
{$1$} (E) -- node[below] {$1$} (A) ;
\draw (A) -- (P) -- (B) -- (D) -- (Q) -- (E) ;
\draw (C) -- (0,1.545) ;
\draw (-3.4,-3.75) node {$72^\circ$} ;
\draw (3.45,-3.75) node {$72^\circ$} ;
\draw (-5.1,0.8) node {$18^\circ\to$} ;
\draw (5.1,0.8) node {$\leftarrow18^\circ$} ;
\draw (-0.35,4.3) node {$54^\circ$} ;
\draw (0.4,4.3) node {$54^\circ$} ;
[/TIKZ]
In the diagram, $ABCDE$ is a regular pentagon with sides of length $1$, and $PBDQ$ is a rectangle. It is clear from the given angles that $BD = 2\sin 54^\circ$ and that $PQ = 1 + 2\sin 18^\circ$. Therefore $2\sin 54^\circ = 1 + 2\sin 18^\circ$, from which $\sin 54^\circ - \sin 18^\circ = \frac12.$[/sp]​
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top