Trouble finding Clebsch-Gordan coefficient for deutron triplet state?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the Clebsch-Gordan coefficient for the deuteron triplet state using lowering operators in quantum mechanics. Participants are exploring the application of the lowering operator and its effects on different states within the context of angular momentum coupling.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the lowering operator and its implications on various states, questioning the validity of their calculations and the assumptions regarding the quantum numbers involved.

Discussion Status

There is an active exchange of ideas regarding the correct application of the lowering operator and the interpretation of quantum numbers. Some participants have offered clarifications on the operator's action, while others are still grappling with specific calculations and assumptions.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of tensor products of spin states and the associated quantum numbers, with some expressing confusion about the definitions of j and m for the states involved.

semc
Messages
364
Reaction score
5
Hi, for the deutron triplet state, I am trying to find the coefficient using the lowering operator but I kept getting 0 hope someone can help me.

Using
J-|j,m>=[(j+m)(j-m+1)]1/2|j,m-1>
I can get from |++> to 1/[itex]\sqrt{2}[/itex](|-+> + |+->) but from here I am stuck since j+m=0 for |+->.

What is wrong with my working? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps you are not remembering that J- has two pieces?

[tex]J_- = J_{1-} + J_{2-}[/tex]
 
[tex]J_- |+-> + |-+> = J_{1-} + J_{2-}|+-> + |-+>[/tex] I am not sure about this part but i split the operators into
[tex]J_- = J_{1-}|+-> + |-+> + J_{2-}|+-> + |-+>[/tex]
so [tex]J_{1-}|+-> + |-+>[/tex] is where I am stuck since [tex]m_1=1/2 , m_2=-1/2[/tex] so everything will be reduced to 0.
 
Don't forget the brackets!

[tex]\left( J_{1-} + J_{2-} \right) \left(\lvert +- \rangle + \lvert -+ \rangle \right)[/tex]

There are 4 terms here, 2 of which survive the lowering operators.
 
Yeah I am aware there are 4 terms but is this correct?
[tex]J_- = J_{1-}|+-> + |-+> + J_{2-}|+-> + |-+>[/tex]
If its correct then I should be able to evaluate this [tex]J_{1-}|+-> + |-+>[/tex]
I am aware that when the lowering operator acts on the lowest eigenvalue it will disappear but I can't continue since the formula has (j+m) term which is 0 for different spins. By the way I am doing revision for this so it would be better if anyone can just tell me what I did wrong here. This is not homework. Thanks
 
You're not using the distributive law correctly: (A+B)(x+y) = Ax + Ay + Bx + By. Every state in the sum should have a lowering operator acting on it.

Two of the terms vanish but two survive because you're acting on a + with the lowering operator.
 
I really still don't see what I did wrong there. I simply use (A+B)(x+y)=A(x+y)+B(x+y). I am having problem here because I am using the lowering operator on + but I am getting 0 which is clearly wrong but I just don't know why I got it wrong. I will show my working

Using the lowering operator [tex]J_-|jm>=((j+m)(j-m+1))^{1/2}|jm-1>[/tex]
on |-+> I got this [tex]J_-|-1/2, 1/2>=((-1/2+1/2)(-1/2-1/2+1))^{1/2}|-1/2,-1/2>[/tex]
[tex](-1/2+1/2)(-1/2-1/2+1)=(0)(0)=0[/tex] and for |+-> the operator is also acting on the second entry which is - so it goes to 0 as well.
Clearly I am making a stupid mistake but I really don't see it myself. Hopefully someone can tell me what's wrong
 
eg.

[tex]S_{1-} \lvert +- \rangle = \lvert -- \rangle[/tex]
 
Sorry, we cross-posted...

[tex]\sqrt{(j+m)(j-m+1)} = \sqrt{(1/2 + 1/2)(1/2 - 1/2 + 1)} = 1[/tex]
 
  • #10
Oxvillian said:
[tex]\sqrt{(j+m)(j-m+1)} = \sqrt{(1/2 + 1/2)(1/2 - 1/2 + 1)} = 1[/tex]

Yes but I believe this is for the case of |++> since j=m=1/2?
 
  • #11
It's also the case for |+-> because J1- only acts on the +. It leaves the - alone.

Maybe that's the point you're missing? J1- lowers the first index and leaves the second alone; J2- acts on the second index and leaves the first alone.
 
  • #12
Yes I am aware of that but in the working I wrote a few post ago, the coefficient is 0 since we have (j+m) which is 0.
 
  • #13
but j=1/2 and m=1/2.
 
  • #14
Think this is the part that I got confuse. For |+-> , does it mean that j=1/2 , m=-1/2?
 
  • #15
semc said:
Think this is the part that I got confuse. For |+-> , does it mean that j=1/2 , m=-1/2?

Aha! I think we've nailed the problem. What you have here is the tensor product of two spin-1/2 states. So j1 = j2= 1/2. The + and - refer to m1 and m2 respectively.

For instance |+-> would have j1 = j2= 1/2, m1 = 1/2 and m2 = -1/2.
 
  • #16
Haha I get it now. Thank you so much for explaining this to me!
 
  • #17
No problem :cool:
 

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K