Trouble Following Diff. Equation: Why Evaluate B(x) in Final Expression?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bitrex
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chain Chain rule
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 2K views
bitrex
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
I'm having some trouble following this equation:

[tex]\frac {d \Phi_B} {dt} = (-) \frac {d}{dx_C} \left[ \int_0^{\ell}dy \ \int_{x_C-w/2}^{x_C+w/2} dx B(x)\right] \frac {dx_C}{dt} = (-) v\ell [ B(x_C+w/2) - B(x_C-w/2)] \[/tex]

Shouldn't the differentiation of the bracketed terms "killed" the integration of B(x)? Why is it still evaluated between the limits in the final expression? Thanks for any advice.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a theorem in calculus that
[tex]\frac{d}{dx} \int_0^x f(y) \, dy = f(x)[/tex]
(i.e. differentiating with respect to the integral boundary)
which you should be able to find in your calculus book.

You can prove your identity by taking any fixed point [itex]x_C - w/2 < x_0 < x_C + w/2[/itex] and write
[tex]\int_{x_C - w/2}^{x_C + w/2} dx B(x) = \int_{x_C - w/2}^{x_0} dx B(x) + \int_{x_0}^{x_C + w/2} dx B(x) = \int_{x_0}^{x_C + w/2} dx B(x) - \int_{x_0}^{x_C - w/2} dx B(x)[/tex]
 
Thank you! That's a good theorem to know!
 
Well, I suppose if I can't recognize that, this is all kind of a lost cause!
 
actually a more general theorem is:

[tex]\frac{d}{dx}\int^{b(x)}_{a(x)}f(s)ds=f(b(x))\frac{db}{dx}-f(a(x))\frac{da}{dx}[/tex]