Trouble understanding contravariant transformations for vectors

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the concept of contravariant transformations for vectors, specifically how vector components transform under coordinate changes. The transformation is defined by the equation $$\overline{a}^j = \sum_{k = 1}^{n} \frac{\partial \overline{x}^j}{\partial x^k} a^k$$, where the partial derivatives relate to the transformation of the coordinate systems. A specific example is provided with the transformation from $(x^1, x^2, ..., x^n)$ to $(2x^1, 2x^2, ..., 2x^n)$, illustrating that the basis vectors transform with a factor of 1/2, while the components transform contravariantly, resulting in a multiplication by 2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector components and their representations
  • Familiarity with coordinate transformations in mathematics
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives and their applications
  • Basic concepts of tangent basis vectors in differential geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical foundations of contravariant and covariant transformations
  • Explore the implications of coordinate transformations in tensor calculus
  • Learn about the geometric interpretation of basis vectors and their transformations
  • Investigate the relationship between contravariant components and their corresponding basis transformations
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, physicists, and anyone studying differential geometry or tensor analysis will benefit from this discussion, particularly those seeking clarity on vector transformations in varying coordinate systems.

whisperzone
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Don't understand equation of contravariant transformation for vectors
Hey, so I've been studying some math on my own and I'm really confused by this one bit. I understand what contravariant components of a vector are, but I don't understand the ways in which they transform under a change of coordinate system.

For instance, let's say we have two coordinate systems ##(x^1, x^2, ..., x^n)## and ##(\overline{x}^1, \overline{x}^2, ..., \overline{x}^n)## and a coordinate transformation relating the two systems: ##\overline{x}^j = \overline{x}^j (x^1, x^2, ..., x^n)##. Everything I've read says that

$$\overline{a}^j = \sum_{k = 1}^{n} \frac{\partial \overline{x}^j}{\partial x^k} a^k, \text{ where } j = 1, 2, ... n$$

but intuitively this makes no sense to me at all. For instance, consider a coordinate transformation ##(x^1, x^2, ..., x^n) \rightarrow (2x^1, 2x^2, ..., 2x^n)##. Then the partial derivative of ##\overline{x}^j## with respect to ##x^k## should be 2, right (or am I missing something here)? And if the partial derivative is 2, is that really a contravariant transformation, since whatever you're applying the transformation to would also get multiplied by 2?

Apologies if anything was too unclear, I've just been struggling with this for a while.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Contravariant refers to transforming the opposite way of the tangent basis vectors, which are defined as
$$
\vec E_i = \frac{\partial \vec x}{\partial x^i}.
$$
This means that
$$
\vec E_i ' = \frac{\partial \vec x}{\partial x^j} \frac{\partial x^j}{\partial x'^i}.
$$
In the case of your transformation, you therefore have ##\vec E_i' = \vec E_i / 2## so there is a factor of 1/2 in the transformation of the basis vectors. The components therefore (which are multiplied by 2) transform in the opposite fashion, i.e., contravariantly.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K