Trouble understanding ##g^{jk}\Gamma^{i}{}_{jk}##

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of the expression ##g^{jk}\Gamma^{i}{}_{jk}## within the context of Riemannian geometry. It is established that this expression represents a contraction of the Christoffel symbols and can be expressed as ##g^{jk}\Gamma^i{}_{jk}=\frac{-1}{\sqrt{g}}\partial_j(\sqrt{g}g^{ij})##, which relates to the divergence of an antisymmetric tensor field. The term appears in the Laplace–Beltrami operator, specifically in the equation ##\Delta f=div ~\nabla f= \partial^2 f-g\Gamma\partial f##. The discussion also touches on the dual nature of the covariant derivative, which includes both a partial derivative and a term involving the Christoffel symbols.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Riemannian geometry concepts
  • Familiarity with Christoffel symbols and their properties
  • Knowledge of the Laplace–Beltrami operator
  • Basic grasp of covariant derivatives and tensor calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of the Laplace–Beltrami operator in Riemannian geometry
  • Study the role of Christoffel symbols in the covariant derivative
  • Explore the divergence theorem in the context of Riemannian manifolds
  • Investigate the relationship between the Levi-Civita connection and curvature
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying Riemannian geometry, particularly those interested in the applications of the Laplace–Beltrami operator and covariant derivatives in their research.

shooride
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hi friends,

I'm learning Riemannian geometry. I'm in trouble with understanding the meaning of ##g^{jk}\Gamma^{i}{}_{jk}##. I know it is a contracting relation on the Christoffel symbols and one can show that ##g^{jk}\Gamma^i{}_{jk}=\frac{-1}{\sqrt{g}}\partial_j(\sqrt{g}g^{ij})## using the Levi-Civita connection, etc-- rhs is similar to the divergence of an antisymmetric tensor field (!)--. But, how should one interpret and call ##g^{jk}\Gamma^i{}_{jk}##?! I'm interested in this term since it appears in the Laplacian of the function ##f## (Laplace–Beltrami operator). Especially, ##\Delta f=div ~\nabla f= \partial^2 f-g\Gamma\partial f## (not using the Einstein notation). The interpretation of first term in the rhs is clear; Is there any clear/simple interpretation for second term?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess I should name ##g^{jk}\Gamma^i{}_{jk}##, ##a^i##:biggrin:.
 
First, do you understand why the covariant derivative of a vector has 2 terms? (I.e., a partial derivative and a term involving ##\Gamma##) ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: shooride
strangerep said:
First, do you understand why the covariant derivative of a vector has 2 terms? (I.e., a partial derivative and a term involving ##\Gamma##) ?
Yeah, since the covariant derivative is a covariant :biggrin:. I think I was a bit confused when I asked this question :oops:. Anyway, do you know whether there is a particular name for the identity ##g^{jk}\Gamma^i{}_{jk}=\frac{-1}{\sqrt{g}}\partial_j(\sqrt{g}g^{ij})##?!
 
shooride said:
[...] do you know whether there is a particular name for the identity ##g^{jk}\Gamma^i{}_{jk}=\frac{-1}{\sqrt{g}}\partial_j(\sqrt{g}g^{ij})##?!
No, I don't know a name.

BTW, for Riemannian geometry stuff involving indices, (which mathematicians usually hate), you can sometimes get more answers by asking in the relativity forum.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K