1. PF Contest - Win "Conquering the Physics GRE" book! Click Here to Enter
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Christoffel symbol manipulation

  1. Jul 7, 2010 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    If the basic equation for the Christoffel symbol is
    \Gamma^l_{ki} = \frac{1}{2} g^{lj} (\partial_k g_{ij} + \partial_i g_{jk} - \partial_j g_{ki})
    so if you bring multiply the first metric into that equation, won't that turn the first two derivatives into derivatives of a mixed metric
    \Gamma^l_{ki} = \frac{1}{2} (\partial_k g^{l}_{i} + \partial_i g^{l}_{k} - g^{lj} \partial_j g_{ki})
    and then, wouldn't the first two terms go to zero, since they're just the derivative of the kronecker delta, which is constant? If that's correct, why not express the symbol instead as
    \Gamma^l_{ki} = \frac{1}{2} ( - g^{lj} \partial_j g_{ki})
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 7, 2010 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Because g^{lj}*partial_k(g_{ij}) is not generally equal to partial_k(g^{lj}*g_{ij})=0. The metric components are not generally constants. Use the product rule on the second expression.
  4. Jul 11, 2010 #3
    oh, jeez, of course. I feel silly now.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Threads - Christoffel symbol manipulation Date
Levi-Civita connection and Christoffel symbols Jan 31, 2017
Christoffel Symbols Dec 2, 2013
Christoffel symbols Nov 11, 2013
Christoffel Symbol / Covariant derivative May 1, 2012
Christoffel Symbols? Jan 20, 2011