Sphere geodesic and Christoffel Symbols

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 9K views
foxjwill
Messages
350
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm trying (on my own) to derive the geodesic for a sphere of radius a using the geodesic equation
[tex]\ddot{u}^i + \Gamma^i_{jk}\dot{u}^j\dot{u}^k,[/tex]​
where [tex]\Gamma^i_{jk}[/tex] are the Christoffel symbols of the second kind, [tex]\dot{u}[/tex] and [tex]\ddot{u}[/tex] are the the first and second derivatives w.r.t. the parameter [tex]t[/tex], and the intrinsic coordinates [tex]u^1=\phi[/tex] and [tex]u^2=\theta[/tex] of the sphere are given by
[tex]\left\{\begin{aligned}<br /> x &= a\cos(\theta)\sin(\phi)\\<br /> y &= a\sin(\theta)\sin(\phi)\\<br /> z &= a\cos(\phi).\end{aligned}\right.[/tex]​



Homework Equations


[tex]\Gamma^i_{jk} = \frac{1}{2}g^{i\ell}(g_{j\ell,k} + g_{k\ell,j} - g_{jk,\ell}),[/tex]​
where [tex]g_{ij,k}=\frac{\partial g_{ij}}{\partial u^k}[/tex] and [tex]g_{ij}[/tex] is the metric tensor of the sphere.



The Attempt at a Solution


I've already shown that [tex]ds^2=a^2d\phi^2 + a^2\cos^2(\phi)d\theta^2[/tex], where [tex]s[/tex] is arclength, and from this I got that the only two non-zero Christoffel symbols of the second kind are
[tex]\Gamma^1_{22} = \sin(\phi)\cos(\phi) \qquad\text{and}\qquad \Gamma^2_{21} = -\tan(\phi).[/tex]​

Plugging these into the geodesic equation, I got the system of ODEs
[tex]\left\{\begin{aligned}<br /> \ddot\phi + \sin(\phi)\cos(\phi)\dot\theta^2 &=0\\<br /> \ddot\theta - \tan(\phi)\dot\theta\dot\phi &=0<br /> \end{aligned}\right.[/tex]​
Dividing the first equation by the differential [tex]d\theta^2[/tex] and the second by [tex]d\phi^2[/tex] produces
[tex]\left\{\begin{aligned}<br /> \frac{d^2\phi}{d\theta^2} + \sin(\phi)\cos(\phi) &= 0\\<br /> \frac{d^2\theta}{d\phi^2} - \tan(\phi)\frac{d\theta}{d\phi} &= 0.<br /> \end{aligned}\right.[/tex]​

Solving the latter, I get
[tex]\theta=c_1\ln(\sec(\phi)+\tan(\phi)) + c_2.[/tex]​
Differentiating and then solving for [tex]\phi'[/tex], we have
[tex]\begin{align*}<br /> \phi' &= \frac{\cos(\phi)}{c_1}.<br /> \end{align*}[/tex]​
So,
[tex]\begin{align*}<br /> \phi'' &= -\frac{\sin(\phi)\phi'}{c_1} = -\frac{\sin(\phi)\cos(\phi)}{c_1^2}.<br /> \end{align*}[/tex]​
However, this would only satisfy the first equation in the ode system if [tex]c_1=\pm1[/tex]. But then the set of geodesics (i.e. the great circles) would have only one degree of freedom which doesn't seem right to me. Did I do something wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is an easier way of doing it:
You have already found the CSotSC [itex]\Gamma[/itex]kij
A curve is a geodesic iff the Levi-Civitia connection (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Levi-CivitaConnection.html) vanishes
Ei= E1= i.e. in the "[itex]\Theta[/itex]" direction
LCE1= [itex]\Gamma[/itex]111 (X[itex]\Theta[/itex]) + [itex]\Gamma[/itex]211 (X[itex]\Phi[/itex]) = 0
[itex]Gamma[/itex]111 is, as you said, 0
[itex]Gamma[/itex]211= sin [itex]Phi[/itex] / cos3 [itex]Phi[/itex] = 0
Since cos [itex]Phi[/itex] =\= 0, sin [itex]Phi[/itex] =0 for the curve in the [itex]Theta[/itex] direction to be a geodesic
This happens when [itex]Phi[/itex] = 0, [itex]Pi[/itex] - ie on the "equator"
From there you can use symettry arguments to show that only great arcs like this are geodesics - i.e. on the equator
 
Edit: [itex]Gamma[/itex]211 = -tan [itex]Phi[/itex] - giving the same result. OOOPS...
 
Last edited: