Trouble understanding the Gamma function

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties and behavior of the Gamma function, particularly regarding its definition, poles, and behavior for negative values of z. Participants explore the implications of the integral definition and the conditions under which it is valid.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that the Gamma function is defined as \(\Gamma(z)=\int_{0}^{\infty}{dt\, t^{z-1}e^{-t}}\) and notes that it has poles for integers of z less than 1, suggesting it should be infinite for non-integer values of z less than 0.
  • This participant reasons that as t approaches 0, the integrand behaves like \(t^{z-1}\), leading to the conclusion that the integral diverges for z<0.
  • Another participant suggests that properties of the integrand could be analyzed by expanding it into a Laurent series.
  • Further clarification is provided that the Gamma function is defined only when z has a positive real part and is extended to the rest of the complex plane through analytic continuation.
  • It is noted that the relationship \(\Gamma(z+1)=z\Gamma(z)\) holds everywhere, which is a key aspect of the function's extension.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the behavior of the Gamma function for negative values of z, with some uncertainty about the implications of the integral's divergence. There is no consensus on the interpretation of the function's properties in this context.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the dependence on the definition of the Gamma function and the conditions under which it is valid. There are unresolved questions regarding the behavior of the integral for negative values of z and the implications of analytic continuation.

vcdfrexzaswq
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
The http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_function" is the integral \Gamma(z)=\int_{0}^{\infty}{dt\, t^{z-1}e^{-t}} . It has poles for integers of z less than 1 and is finite everywhere else. But to me it seems like it should be infinite for non integer values of z less than 0.

My reasoning: when t is close to 0, the function t^{z-1}e^{-t} is approximately equal to t^{z-1}.

The integral \int_{t_1}^{t_2}{dt\, t^{z-1}} is equal to (t_2^{z} - t_1^{z})/z. When z<0 and t_1 = 0, t_1^{z} is infinite. Thus it seems the integral \int_{0}^{\infty}{dt\, t^{z-1}e^{-t}} has an infinite contribution right after t=0 for z<0.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
properties of the integrand may be seen by expanding it into a Laurent series
 
vcdfrexzaswq said:
The http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_function" is the integral \Gamma(z)=\int_{0}^{\infty}{dt\, t^{z-1}e^{-t}} .

Only when z has positive real part. It is extended to the rest of the complex plane by analytic continuation or, equivalently, by enforcing that \Gamma(z+1)=z\Gamma(z) holds everywhere.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
gel said:
Only when z has positive real part. It is extended to the rest of the complex plane by analytic continuation or, equivalently, by enforcing that \Gamma(z+1)=z\Gamma(z) holds everywhere.

Ok thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K