Troubleshooting Accelerometers - Calibration Issues

  • Thread starter Thread starter czechman45
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accelerometer
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calibration of triaxial accelerometers and the implications of orientation on acceleration readings. Participants explore the relationship between sensor orientation, gravity, and acceleration measurements, addressing both theoretical and practical aspects of using these sensors in various applications.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the logic behind different voltage readings for the same axis of a triaxial accelerometer when oriented differently, suggesting it contradicts the concept of acceleration.
  • Another participant points out the necessity of accounting for gravity, specifically the downward acceleration of 9.81 m/s², in interpreting the readings.
  • A third participant confirms that different readings based on orientation are expected and explains that the 3D acceleration vector can be computed relative to a calibrated origin, emphasizing the importance of understanding vector magnitudes.
  • One participant reiterates the initial concern about orientation affecting readings and introduces the equivalence principle, suggesting that acceleration and gravity are fundamentally indistinguishable, which may complicate the participant's problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of orientation on acceleration readings. While there is agreement that orientation affects readings, the interpretation of these effects and their implications for calibration and application remains contested.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential limitations in understanding the relationship between orientation and acceleration readings, particularly regarding the assumptions made about gravity and the calibration process. There are unresolved questions about how to handle varying orientations in practical applications.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to researchers and practitioners working with accelerometers in experimental setups, as well as those involved in sensor calibration and data interpretation in physics and engineering contexts.

czechman45
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Our lab just got these fancy new accelerometers that I'm trying to figure out. They are triaxial, but are not yet calibrated. As I was looking into how to calibrate them, I realized that, for a given axis, I would get a different voltage reading depending on whether the axis was oriented vertically (positive down), horizontally, or vertically (positive up). This is in fact how they recommend calibrating them.

Here's my problem. Doesn't this go against the whole idea of acceleration?! In each case, the sensor is not accelerating, it is just oriented differently, so why am I reading different values for the acceleration.

Also, does this mean that once the sensors are calibrated, that all of the readings I get will be orientation specific? If so, who is that dealt with? I would have a constantly changing orientation and no way to find euler angles.

Thanks for any help that you can give.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Are you accounting for gravity, and downward acceleration of 9.81 m/s^2?
 
Yes, each axis will give different readings depending on orientation, that is the whole purpose of a triaxial accelerometer. You can compute the 3D acceleration vector relative to the calibrated origin. If you only care about total magnitude of acceleration, then you can can to compute the length of the vector by sum of squares. total^2 = x^2 + y^2 + z^2
 
czechman45 said:
Here's my problem. Doesn't this go against the whole idea of acceleration?! In each case, the sensor is not accelerating, it is just oriented differently, so why am I reading different values for the acceleration.

Depending on your application, there may be fundamentally no solution to your problem. It's the equivalence principle that says acceleration and gravity are indistinguishable.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
15K
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K