mtworkowski@o
- 213
- 0
When mine kick in it's like I'm sliding on ice. I'm pulling the fuse. Is there something wrong with them or do they just work badly by design? 04 Dakota.
The discussion revolves around troubleshooting the anti-lock braking system (ABS) on a 2004 Dodge Dakota pickup truck. Participants explore the performance of the ABS under various conditions, the design implications of driving an unloaded truck, and the subjective experience of braking effectiveness. The conversation includes technical explanations, personal experiences, and suggestions for testing and modifying the braking system.
Participants express differing views on the effectiveness and design of the ABS in the Dakota, with no consensus reached on whether the system is functioning correctly or if it requires modification. Some participants advocate for testing and careful driving practices, while others express skepticism about the ABS technology itself.
Participants mention various assumptions about vehicle weight, driving conditions, and personal experiences with braking, which may influence their perspectives. The discussion includes unresolved questions about the specific performance of the ABS under different scenarios.
mtworkowski@o said:When mine kick in it's like I'm sliding on ice. I'm pulling the fuse. Is there something wrong with them or do they just work badly by design? 04 Dakota.
mtworkowski@o said:Should I pull the fuse now or wait for an accident?
NoTime said:A) Did the ABS always work as described?
B) Just what kind of road conditions are you on when this occurs.
C) How hard are you trying to brake in those conditions.
mgb_phys said:I wouldn't pull any fuses - you don't know what else they are disabling!
I would recognise that if you are driving a large pickup truck you have to drive more like a professional truck driver. Leave a bigger gap in front of you, like twice the stopping distance of a car, check traffic and lights further ahead.
Basicaly just think that driving 3tons of heavy iron gives you more capability than a minivan but it also gives you more responsibility to drive better.
If you are often driving it empty you might have to keep some extra weight (bags of sand) over the back axle - especially in winter.
Or you can buy a Subaru and rely on it's amazing brakes and accelaration to get you out of trouble!
mtworkowski@o said:I have another brake related question. I've noticed that the calipers on some cars are in different places. To my thinking the front caliper should be behind the wheel. The back of the rotor is going up. I think this would keep the front from diving on hard braking. Also the back caliper should be in front of the wheel. To keep the back of the car from lifting. I don't see this consistently on all cars. I just saw a Buick SUV with the calipers in exactly the opposite locations.
mtworkowski@o said:On wet surfaces I can apply the brakes hard enough to cause the front wheels to lock up.
One of the most unnerving failures that can occur with this system is the loss of pedal when braking. The problem may feel like a bad master cylinder, but it may not be the master cylinder. The real problem may be a bad Electro Hydraulic (EH) valve in the rear wheel antilock brake system.
pantaz said:Okay, now I understand -- your truck has http://www.abs-education.org/faqs/faqindex.htm" . That was/is offered on trucks only. (I think my friend's Chevy Blazer had it, too.)
This article describes some of the problems you are experiencing:
http://www.aa1car.com/library/abs_kelseyhayes_rwal.htm
mtworkowski@o said:To my thinking the front caliper should be behind the wheel. The back of the rotor is going up. I think this would keep the front from diving on hard braking. Also the back caliper should be in front of the wheel. To keep the back of the car from lifting. I don't see this consistently on all cars. I just saw a Buick SUV with the calipers in exactly the opposite locations.
mtworkowski@o said:The back brakes on any vehicle are pretty week. They do almost nothing.
mtworkowski@o said:I also drove a motorcycle for a while and I know from that, that the only way to stop is to hit the front brake. The back brake only made the back end swirve out if you hit that one by itself.
mtworkowski@o said:I contend that you could go and cut your rear brakes right out of the loop and nothing would happen.
Mech_Engineer said:The brake calipers are mounted to the steering knuckle, and reaction forces from them being used are taken by the knuckle. They aren't mounted to the suspension, so what side of the rotor they are on has no bearing on the braking characteristics of the vehicle, it is only an engineering consideration based on the location of things like steering components.
The front suspension dives and the rear lifts during braking because the vehicle's center of mass is above the ground. When you're braking the acceleration force acts upon of vehicle's center of mass, while the braking force from the wheels acts at the ground. Because of this, there is a resultant torque that acts on the body of the vehicle and causes it to "dive." Technologies dealing with reducing braking dive tend to have adjustable rate shock absorbers/springs and accelerometers.
Just because the rear brakes on a car aren't as strong as the front, doesn't mean they do nothing. If a wheel is touching the ground, it can impart a braking force on the road.
This isn't a particularly useful comparison, but motorcycle driver's training states that in an emergency stop you should brake using both the front and rear brakes.
On a car, the rear brakes DO help a car stop faster, and it is important to make sure they do not lock up in an emergency stop because if the rear brakes lock up the rear end of the vehicle will want to slide out (especially if the car is turning while braking).
Your vehicle would stop slower. "Its obvious you have a poor understanding of vehicle dynamics in braking."