Trying an alternative to Trig Substitutions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nano-Passion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trig
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around exploring alternative methods to traditional trigonometric substitution for the integral \(\int \frac{\sqrt{x^2-3}}{x} dx\). The user initially attempts to apply trigonometric identities but struggles with converting \(dx\) to \(d\theta\). A suggested substitution of \(x = \sqrt{3} \cosh \theta\) is proposed, which leads to complications. Ultimately, the consensus is that while the alternative method is not a dead end, it essentially leads back to the original trigonometric substitution, confirming its effectiveness.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of trigonometric identities and substitutions
  • Familiarity with hyperbolic functions, specifically \(\cosh\) and \(\sinh\)
  • Knowledge of integral calculus, particularly integration techniques
  • Ability to manipulate differential expressions, such as converting \(dx\) to \(d\theta\)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of hyperbolic functions in calculus
  • Learn about trigonometric substitution techniques in integral calculus
  • Explore the relationship between \(dx\) and \(d\theta\) in various substitutions
  • Review common integral forms and their solutions, particularly those involving square roots
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians exploring integration techniques, and anyone interested in alternative methods for solving integrals involving square roots and trigonometric functions.

Nano-Passion
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
0
I wanted to try an alternative method to the proverbial technique used in trig substitution. Is this method a dead-end or is there hope for it?

\int \frac{\sqrt{x^2-3}}{x} dx
Using trig substitution
c^2=a^2+b^2
a = \sqrt{c^2-b^2}
∴ c = x, b = \sqrt{3}
Assigning these values to a triangle, where a is adjacent to theta and b is opposite to theta we get..
\int \frac{\sqrt{x^2-3}}{x} dx = \int \frac{a}{x} dx = \int cos \theta dx

And I've hit a wall. I can't seem to be able to adequately convert dx to dθ.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could try the substitution: x=\sqrt 3 \cosh \theta
 
Nano-Passion said:
I wanted to try an alternative method to the proverbial technique used in trig substitution. Is this method a dead-end or is there hope for it?

\int \frac{\sqrt{x^2-3}}{x} dx
Using trig substitution
c^2=a^2+b^2
a = \sqrt{c^2-b^2}
∴ c = x, b = \sqrt{3}
Assigning these values to a triangle, where a is adjacent to theta and b is opposite to theta we get..
\int \frac{\sqrt{x^2-3}}{x} dx = \int \frac{a}{x} dx = \int cos \theta dx

And I've hit a wall. I can't seem to be able to adequately convert dx to dθ.
Your substitution appears to be \displaystyle \cos(\theta)=\frac{\sqrt{x^2-3}}{x}\ .

In that case, how is dx related to dθ ?
 
sharks said:
You could try the substitution: x=\sqrt 3 \cosh \theta

I just did, it starts becoming ugly. And your still plagued by the dx so it hasn't made a difference.

Edit: I think I over-complicated things, I'm reviewing my method.

Edit: Either way, I feel a bit uncomfortable with the approach because I don't know how

x = \sqrt{3} cosh \theta
 
Last edited:
SammyS said:
Your substitution appears to be \displaystyle \cos(\theta)=\frac{\sqrt{x^2-3}}{x}\ .

In that case, how is dx related to dθ ?

Well, it doesn't seem that I can know until I can explicitly define the function in terms of x.
 
It works out by the substitution that i suggested. What is the final answer given in your book/notes?
 
sharks said:
It works out by the substitution that i suggested. What is the final answer given in your book/notes?

\sqrt{3} \int (sec^2 \theta - 1) d\theta
\sqrt{3} (tan \theta - \theta)
 
The substitution reccomended in post #2 should solve the problem.
 
dextercioby said:
The substitution reccomended in post #2 should solve the problem.

I can use any of the proverbial substitutions given in the book but that is besides the point. I was trying to do it in a different way and just need to know if my method is a dead end or not.

And at any rate, I'm not too familiar with the hyperbolic functions and how he derived that substitution equivalent.
 
  • #10
Why are the substitutions in your book "proverbial"? I don't recally any proverbs related to Calculus!

In any case, your method is not a "dead end" but it is exactly the trig substitution you apparently are trying to avoid. Taking x to be the hypotenuse of your right triangle and the "near side" to be \sqrt{x^3- 3}, the "opposite side" has length 3 so sin(\theta)= 3/x, x= 3/sin(\theta)= 3csc(\theta). From that, dx= 3 d(csc(\theta))= -3 csc(\theta)cot(\theta) d\theta.
 
  • #11
HallsofIvy said:
Why are the substitutions in your book "proverbial"? I don't recally any proverbs related to Calculus!

Proverbial as in widely known and common.

In any case, your method is not a "dead end" but it is exactly the trig substitution you apparently are trying to avoid. Taking x to be the hypotenuse of your right triangle and the "near side" to be \sqrt{x^3- 3}, the "opposite side" has length 3 so sin(\theta)= 3/x, x= 3/sin(\theta)= 3csc(\theta). From that, dx= 3 d(csc(\theta))= -3 csc(\theta)cot(\theta) d\theta.

Hmm, I see now. ^.^ Thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K