Trying to invert an expression

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Morberticus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expression
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical expression n(k) = ∫ cos(k(x-y)) f(x,y) dxdy, which resembles a cosine transform. The user seeks to invert this expression to isolate f(x,y). Participants clarify the inclusion of k in the integral and suggest utilizing the inverse Fourier transform as a viable method for inversion. A reference to a cosine transform resource is provided for further exploration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus, particularly double integrals.
  • Familiarity with Fourier transforms and their properties.
  • Knowledge of cosine transforms and their applications.
  • Basic concepts of signal processing and transformation techniques.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of the cosine transform.
  • Learn about the inverse Fourier transform and its derivation.
  • Explore examples of 2D integral transforms in signal processing.
  • Review the provided resource on cosine transforms for practical applications.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, signal processing engineers, and students studying integral transforms and their applications in various fields.

Morberticus
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
I've come across an expression that looks like

n(k) = ∫cos(x-y)f(x,y)dxdy

Is there a name for this transform? I would like to invert it to obtain f(x,y) but I'm not used to the 2D integral on the RHS. I tried to turn it into a Fourier transform:

n(k) = 1/2 ( ∫eixe-iyf(x,y)dxdy + ∫e-ixeiyf(x,y)dxdy)

but got stuck. Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, there is something of strange, where is ##k## in the integral?, you say ##n(k)## but in the right side I don't see ##k##, and what is the domain of integration ?
 
You are right! Sorry, I forgot about the k when writing down the expression(s). The correct expression is

n(k) = ∫ cos( k(x-y) ) f(x,y) dxdy

Thanks
 
I think your transform is analogous to the ''cosine transform'', I hope you can find something useful here

http://dsp-book.narod.ru/TAH/ch03.pdf

but I think (as you wrote...) it is possible to use the inverse Fourier transform...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K