A Trying to plot a graph of energy densities for radiation and PBHs

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around modeling a plot of energy density relations for radiation and Primordial Black Holes (PBHs), with the user seeking assistance due to inaccuracies in their current model. They assume PBHs decay into a Planck relic instantaneously and question whether conservation laws apply to their plots. The user notes that the model breaks down for smaller beta values and is open to providing more details or formulas if needed. They are advised to use the PF LaTeX feature for posting equations instead of images. The thread highlights the complexities involved in accurately representing these energy densities in a graph.
di_a_tonic17
Messages
1
Reaction score
2
So a bit of context, I've been trying to model a plot of energy density relation for radiation and Primordial BH, but it is not right. Would someone be able to help me out? This is what I have so far. I am assuming the PBHs decay into a Planck relic, and the decay is instantaneous. Does the conservation law not follow through for the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th plots? Also, it completely breaks down for smaller values of beta. I'm attaching my calculation breakdown in the images below.


Any help would be appreciated.


If any more details are required, I'd be happy to provide them
 

Attachments

  • output (1).png
    output (1).png
    41.7 KB · Views: 50
  • PXL_20240711_102107233.jpg
    PXL_20240711_102107233.jpg
    22.2 KB · Views: 60
  • PXL_20240704_203910760~2.jpg
    PXL_20240704_203910760~2.jpg
    29 KB · Views: 49
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
Including the formulas used would be helpful.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
di_a_tonic17 said:
I'm attaching my calculation breakdown in the images below.
Images for equations are not acceptable here. Please use the PF LaTeX feature to post equations directly. There is a "LaTeX Guide" link at the bottom left of each post window.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top